News

NewsOur 4 Simple Financial New Year’s Resolutions
Our 4 Simple Financial New Year’s Resolutions

Our 4 Simple Financial New Year’s Resolutions

The start of the financial year isn’t marked by any fireworks, but unlike the dawn of the calendar year it’s a much better time to make money-based resolutions.

Most NYE-inspired goals bite the dust quickly and it’s statistically easier to resolve to save your money than lose weight or stop smoking.

There’s no end of lists of things we all should do around our finances but sadly as mere humans we don’t always even start them, let alone attain them.

So below is a short and practical number of steps you can begin today which over time can help you spend less, save more and get on with life.

There are three bigger tips well suited for this time of year and then some simpler steps which can be done anytime but are too often delayed!

The FiftyUp Club start of financial year checklist:

What am I worth?

Surely one of the most obvious starting points is benchmarking your net wealth and it’s the most prone to poor guesstimates and wishful thinking.

Once you’ve got a good measure of your assets and liabilities it’s much easier to revise it annually and make better plans.

Start off with the government’s MoneySmart calculator:

https://www.moneysmart.gov.au/tools-and-resources/calculators-and-apps/your-net-worth-calculator

It helps you tally up what you owe and what you own and discover how robust your financial position really is.

There are some fiddly bits such as digging up investment details but even a quick run-through can help.

Do this every year.

Can I manage this alone or do I need trustworthy advice?

Arguably money and investment in itself isn’t complicated, beyond a few concepts such as risk and return and diversification, but the terms and conditions and taxation certainly can be.

And our own deeply personal attitudes to building and protecting our wealth are fraught with our own fears, biases and unfounded hopes.

Factor in your significant other and their attitudes, and now it can become harder to develop and follow the habits and practices needed to reach your financial goals.

There’s been much negative publicity around financial planners and arguments around the laws to protect consumers from poor and predatory adviser practises.

It is now changing with moves to improve standards, protections and consumer empowerment around financial advice.

There can be a real cost to not seeking advice if you need it, either through making poor decisions about your wealth or procrastinating and making none at all.

To find a competent and trustworthy adviser start off with this ASIC MoneySmart guide:

https://www.moneysmart.gov.au/investing/financial-advice/choosing-a-financial-adviser )

This article from the Sydney Morning Herald also has some good tips:

http://www.smh.com.au/money/planning/positive-indicators-of-a-good-financial-adviser-20140916-10dutu.html

Finding a good planner might take time and you need to ask the right questions to ensure they’ll work for you but many professional relationships last for years.

But always review fees and charges and ensure any advice and sales of investment products are in your best interest.

Review your superannuation status and life insurance needs

If you have a super statement, open and read it and look at the fees and charges and of course the returns. The fund you are in and any extra amounts you can tip in will make a real difference over time.

Fortunately there’s the government’s Moneysmart super calculator:

https://www.moneysmart.gov.au/tools-and-resources/calculators-and-apps/superannuation-calculator

This will show how much you’ll have to retire on and the impact of fees. It only takes five minutes.

Too many people in Australia don’t have any or adequate life insurances to protect their families in the event of accident and illness.

There can be cover within your super but check the payouts – often the default amount (what you get without changing it or paying more) is not very much.

Hefty upfront commissions of more than 100% of premiums that were paid to those selling life insurance are on the way out and there’ll be more fee-for-service options.

And there are a number of other ways to buy life insurance — through TV ads, Coles supermarket sells it with age conditions, and of course there’s a FiftyUp Club offer to compare.

Again you can check out the independent and authoritative Moneysmart guide here:

https://www.moneysmart.gov.au/insurance/life-insurance

Quick tips you can do anytime. But start now!

  • Reduce and consolidate credit card debt. There’s $33 billion outstanding on the plastic. It’s a handy but very pricey way to borrow.
  • Check out your credit score. The banks and other lenders find out what your score so you should know it first. It’s going to start to influence what you’ll pay for personal loans and you can improve your score over time. You can now get it free – just put “credit score” in your search engine.
  • Switch and save. Electricity, private health insurance, other insurances, high cost credit cards, home loans, etc... There are so many of those regular boring bills where you can save serious money by changing to better-priced alternatives.

While far from perfect, I have sought to practise  what I preach by doing all of the above. You can find other such tips online.

The biggest mistake you can make it to do nothing at all, so do try and do something!

What are your tips for the New Financial Year? Share them with other members in the forum below:

Originally posted on .

Join the conversation

FiftyUp Club
Our 4 Simple Financial New Year’s Resolutions

Share your views with other members. 

Want to leave a comment? or .
Read our moderation policy here.
Someone
Someone from NSW commented:

Former Singapore prime minister Lee Kuan Yew famously warned in 1980 that Australia was destined to become the "poor white trash" of Asia and our chances have increased exponentially under bigot of incompetent Abbott's government, believe me... Next time, do me a favor, vote for The Greens, thank you... 

Someone
Someone from NSW commented:

* "do me..." and "DO YOUR COUNTRY" A FAVOR... If you do not like your country, vote again for Abbott... and suffer the 'massive' consequences (you, your children, their children, etc...), YOU HAVE NO IDEA how bad this government is, Australia may never recover from the exactions of the coalition... 

Warren
Warren from NSW commented:

Have you noticed that we are in 2015, you drongo, and what has this got to do with the subject matter? 

Someone
Someone from NSW replied to Warren:

Libs ARE and have always been war mongers (thank them for DAESH...) who ALWAYS sell the 'farm'... 

Someone
Someone from NSW replied to Warren:

Coming from an obsolete parochial nut who lives in the 50's like his idol of a 'pretend' Christian, this beats it all! 

Someone
Someone from NSW commented:

IDEALLY FOR OBNOXIOUS CLOWN OF ABBOT YOU SHOULD HAVE PASSED AWAY BEFORE YOU RETIRE: the Libs once again for you (!) and here is why according to the AAP: Labor has called on the government to rule out increasing to 65 the age Australians can first access their superannuation. The change is canvassed in a report by the Productivity Commission, released on Tuesday, showing it could increase Treasury coffers by $7 billion a year towards the middle of the century. Its modelling also suggests households that delay their retirement would be expected to do so by two years and see their super savings increase by about 10 per cent by the time they retire. The opposition is not impressed. Shadow treasurer Chris Bowen says making people wait longer to access their super would be a retrograde step. "Clearly the prime minister should rule that out today," he told ABC radio. Liberal MP Andrew Laming said it was no secret the government wanted Australians to stay in the workforce longer. "In a wealthy economy, where we're all living longer we do have to think about collecting superannuation later, for the simple reason that it needs to last for our expected longevity," he said. But there needed to be arrangements for people who pull out of the workforce involuntarily because of illness or redundancies - something the commission recommended. The commission dispelled the myth that retirees waste their super, finding most are prudent in the ways they spend the saving. Less than 30 per cent of super benefits are taken as lump sums and when they are, Australians frequently use it to pay down debt, invest, or purchase "durable goods" to use through their retirement, the report said. (1 of 2) 

Someone
Someone from NSW commented:

(continued - 2 of 2 ) The commission called for a further holistic review of retirement and superannuation, an idea pushed by the Australian Greens. The preservation age for superannuation already is being gradually increased from 55 and will reach 60 by 2025. Mr Abbott last week ruled out his government ever increasing taxes on superannuation. Labor has announced plans to cut super tax concessions for high-income earners, raising the budget $14 billion in a decade. 

Warren
Warren from NSW commented:

Your own input (1st sentence) portrays you as a sicko. The balance of your input makes sense even though it was plagiarized from some newspaper no doubt on superannuation. It's a discussion we have to have. 

Someone
Someone from NSW replied to Warren:

Not as sick as Abbott, though and my influence is far from being as large as his... Don't blame me, I did not vote for the clown, you admitted you did... 

Warren
Warren from NSW commented:

Where do you get this rubbish from - just ramblings of a poor lost soul. You have no conceptual understanding of Superannuation, as you parrot other peoples uneducated views. 

Someone
Someone from NSW replied to Warren:

Australia is doomed thanks to parochial red necks like you... What do you know about super? Go to your room! 

Someone
Someone from NSW commented:

Another tip would be to avoid being 'subversive' under the authoritarian regime of the obnoxious bigot (or do it at your own risk, some are already risking two years in a jail for telling what they see in his concentration camps, beware...): Just avoid singing our national anthem, the 2nd verse in particular: " For those who've come across the seas We've boundless plains to share"... NO FURTHER COMMENT 

margaret
margaret from NSW commented:

Certainly we have boundless plains as well as desert areas and are happy to share. Unfortunately 'those who come across the seas', may have been plain and desert dwellers in their country of birth, however their desire to live in, and their ability to develop those areas in Australia, is usually lacking. Unfortunately we do not have enough affordable housing in the desired areas for our own, so increasing the intake of those who will wish come to these areas, especially if they do not have the skills that produce the required income, may not be as wise or kind as some may think. 

Someone
Someone from NSW replied to margaret:

You are perhaps "happy to share" with 'anglos' like you and your excuses (not unusual with parochial Aussies) are not acceptable... Mind you, the Chinese are in the process of invading the country and will not have to fire a shot, your punishment at the end of the day, or is it? 

margaret
margaret from NSW commented:

Oh dear you are an angry human,willing to misinterpret and dodge the reality of a point just to vent your anger. Please address the points made, not simply your version of them.. 

Warren
Warren from NSW replied to margaret:

Margaret, my best advice is to ignore the rambling of this racist sicko. 

Someone
Someone from NSW replied to Warren:

A "racist" is someone who voted for the coalition. 

Someone
Someone from NSW commented:

My tip for the New Financial Year? Here it is, grave, but worth pondering and understanding, so important it is for the future of our country: "Of course the people don't want war. But after all, it's the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it's always a simple matter to drag the people along whether it's a democracy, a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism, and exposing the country to greater danger." Herman Goering at the Nuremberg trials 

Someone
Someone from NSW commented:

This one was not part of their New Years resolutions, for 10000 of them! What happens when healthcare turns into a business, as the Libs want it (and are doing everything to get it...): While the worst PM in the history of Australia is "distracting" you with the dangers of terrorists and refugees (to remain in power: if you are scared, you will then need HIM, you will hear his tough stand on refugees and terrorists and will fall for his inhuman treatment of... us all...) there is a major -and REAL that one- scare in three Sydney dentist's surgeries: Hygiene breaches have put 11,000 people at risk of HIV and hepatitis! Dr Chan, the owner of The Gentle Dentist, employs 21 dentists across the three surgeries, including Dr Starkenburg who is "very sorry" about what had happened, but, at 75 years, he said his age had made it difficult for him to keep up with changing regulations. Remember: THERE ARE ALWAYS INFECTION CONTROL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH & SAFETY ISSUES IN PRIVATE (BIG BUSINESS LIKE ) HEALTHCARE PRACTICES, WHY? THEY CUT CORNERS, THE ALMIGHTY $ IS "EVERYTHING", YOU, THE PATIENT COME NEXT... The Australian Dental Association NSW also declined to comment on Wednesday except to say that patients concerned that they may have been affected can call the helpline 1800 610 344 from 9am Thursday. 

Someone
Someone from NSW commented:

Does this make any sense, Warren? What about the picture below? Will he get the message? 

Warren
Warren from NSW commented:

So why does 21 rogue dentists from a population of 21,000 dentist in Australia suggest to you that we have a problem! Don't think so! OHS obviously worked as they're out of business now. 

Someone
Someone from NSW replied to Warren:

Can you read?... whats in capital letters... 

Someone
Someone from NSW commented:

https://fbcdn-sphotos-f-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xfp1/v/t1.0-9/10712875_840244969360722_1361116821015715189_n.jpg?oh=ab762f6226b75de327612d9428eac8c8&oe=55E98E05&__gda__=1445776780_01c6de59386f2b8298ae58d5e0f1c881 

Someone
Someone from NSW commented:

Put aside enough now for the "stealth" GP tax: Did you know that from today, millions of patients are set to be hit with a GP Tax by stealth, as Tony Abbott’s four year freeze on Medicare rebates begins. Analysis shows this will amount to around $8.43 for many people, for every visit to the doctor. This is bad policy – bad for patients and doctors: Tony Abbott has broken his promise that the GP Tax is dead, just like his promise before the 2013 election not to cut health, nor pensions! 

Warren
Warren from NSW commented:

I think we want more money allocated to mental health. What do you think NSW 'A'? 

Someone
Someone from NSW commented:

Continued: The committee's chairman, Labor Senator Sam Dastyari, told AM that the companies needed to be called to account on their tax affairs. "The numbers themselves are alarming. Frankly the pharmaceutical companies in Australia have set the trend when it comes to tax minimisation and profit shifting," he said. "They're actually charging themselves exorbitant fees to sell their own drugs from one of their subsidiaries in a low-tax nation. "The technique that they're using is to make their company artificially unprofitable in Australia and more profitable on paper in a lower tax jurisdiction. "This is classic tax minimisation techniques and they have to be held to account." Senator Dastyari rejected the pharmaceutical companies' claims that they were operating with the current law. "Frankly, if you were to believe the books that have been presented by the pharmaceutical companies, pharma in Australia is one of the worst businesses going around because they can't make a dollar," he said. "We all know that's not true. We know they're getting $3.5 billion from PBS. We know that they've got incredible levels of sales." The Australian Tax Office (ATO) is scrutinising the affairs of multinationals and last month ATO commissioner Chris Jordan confirmed that at least four big drug makers were being audited. Federal Treasurer Joe Hockey recently gave the ATO wider powers to recover missing tax and to impose fines of up to 100 per cent of tax that should have been paid.> Now, out of approx. 350 companies only 30 are targeted by the ATO who has been recently deprived of 2000 employees by Abbott and his accomplices. 

Warren
Warren from NSW commented:

Well done NSW ‘A’. You’ve successfully plagiarized Sam’s ‘Dick Dartardly and Muttley’s’ press release. He’s prone to sensationalism but when the crunch comes he treads water. Can you in one small sentence summarize what he said? Is it illegal? How come Rudd/Gillard/Roxon/Plibersek did nothing in their 6 years? More importantly how would you as the most outspoken person on the site solve this problem? 

Someone
Someone from NSW commented:

Some who are once again starting the fiscal year with a big 'bang' and don't need a "Money Smart "calculators to calculate how they rip us off are the pharmaceutical labs who get away in Australia with paying very little tax with so far, the endorsement of our totalitarian government (who prefer to hit the single mums and pensioners): Nine major drug makers will be questioned about their tax minimisation strategies at a Senate committee hearing today after data showed they allegedly only paid a combined $85 million in tax out of $8.2 billion in revenue. The powerful Senate Economics References Committee will call big pharmaceutical chiefs to account on their tax practices, with a special focus on revenue they derive from the government-funded pharmaceutical benefits scheme (PBS). Companies including Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Merck Sharp & Dohme and GlaxoSmithKline will be questioned at the hearing in Sydney about profit-shifting techniques through transfer pricing and royalty payments to subsidiaries in other countries. The senate committee has received official data showing that between the nine companies more than $3.5 billion was received from PBS funding in 2014. Of $8.2 billion in total revenue, it is claimed the companies paid tax of $85 million, which equates to a 1 per cent tax rate. 

Comment Guidelines