News

NewsNew Year Grudge Purchases
New Year Grudge Purchases

New Year Grudge Purchases

This January we’re going to look into the various ‘grudge purchases’ around different insurance products, such as car, home, health and even life to see how you might save time, money and worry in choosing what suits.

There are few certainties in life but it’s a fair bet that come April 1 your private health insurance premium will rise by far more than your income or other price rises.

The government will announce the actual figure soon, it was more than 6% last year, amidst a major review of a system which offers some 48,000 different policies!

With price hikes like that, and a widespread confusion about what sort of cover we actually have, it’s little surprise  500,000 people cancelled or downgraded their policies last year.

It’s worth getting your head around some of the very different submissions from the peak health consumer group and the insurers as they could cost or save you significantly.

The Consumers Health Forum wants to see a nationally standard and legislated health insurance product, it calls myCover, for basic hospital policies which all health funds would have to offer.

There would be a range of packages to cater for different life stages and there would be only be few excluded procedures  and standard excesses.

It would make the authorities’ constant plea for us to all ‘shop around’ a whole lot easier as it would be more realistic to compare the actual costs and value of policies.

The Forum also conducted a survey which found the respondents average annual costs for policies was $3,377 per year with just under $2000 for singles and over $4000 for families.

Additional out-of-pocket expenses, which we have dealt with before at the FiftyUp Club, amount to a tad more than $2000.

The Forum’s summary of the survey does not bode well for a system where just 38% of their respondents felt satisfied with their policies.

“…while people are choosing to take out private health insurance for apparently practical reasons, they do not appear to be receiving overall value for having insurance in the absence of a medical need.”

Meanwhile the whole $19 billion system only exists due to complex and costly regulation in the shape of various ‘carrots’ to encourage participation  such as the means-tested rebate now down effectively to 25% from 30%.

The more prominent ‘sticks’ are costs the consumer wears if they don’t take out cover and  earn over a threshold or are aged more than 30

For examples the industry body Private Healthcare Australia wants a key ‘stick’ the Medicare levy surcharge to increase from one per cent .

It’s the amount higher income earners are slugged if they don’t have a basic private cover for hospitals.

Due to all those the price increases it’s now just cheaper for someone on $90,000 to pay the surcharge than buy such a policy.

The ‘surcharge stick’, which was brought in to drive us into the system, is apparently losing its sting.

There are big changes afoot for private health insurance this year and it’s important the government hears from ‘ordinary people’ as much as lobby groups.

Please take a minute to fill out the quick survey and let us convey your voice to the decision makers before it is too late.

 

Originally posted on .

Join the conversation

FiftyUp Club
New Year Grudge Purchases

Share your views with other members. 

Want to leave a comment? or .
Read our moderation policy here.
Leslie
Leslie from NSW commented:

It would be good if you could go to a private health insurer and specify what exactly you want coverage for eg cardiac,optical etc and then ask them for a quote. The current system needs a complete overhaul as there are too many providers each with their own costly administrative overheads. Les NSW 

Susan
Susan from NSW commented:

well when you are on a fixed payment like the pension, the price of health insurance makes it harder and harder to remain in it, it is a pity our over paid politicians don't come down to our level and get by on every day expenses and just see how they would last, particularly as they would have to use their own money not using the tax payers money. 

kerry
kerry from WA commented:

Iam just fedup with price risers,when you come to use your private health cover witch we haven't needed for years, all of a sudden you have to pay extra.Iam not sure what we should do. 

bill
bill from QLD commented:

gap is getting wider, not worth the cost, GREED!! 

Clare
Clare from NSW commented:

I always read the news from50upclub,it's very informative,protective for the seniors who need a strong voice,pl. support us ,we don't have to pay for procedure such as liposuction,sterilisation which is inappropriate for our aged group,we should have a discount or incentive for opting it out.thanks,Clare,NSW. 

Emil
Emil from NSW commented:

Karen ,You make so much sense. 

Desiree
Desiree from QLD commented:

I switched from HCF to Westfund in May 2014. Westfund provides the same cover but saves us $50 p/month. I would really like to see a 'cost per cover' introduced i.e. have a price for each item and then choose which ones you would like, or more importantly need, to be covered for. This way you wouldn't have to pay for things that aren't needed at that time in your life. Why should age related diseases be grouped with pregnancy? 

anony
anony from NSW commented:

we should strengthen the public system so that the private system can be truly private. for the rich 

Ross
Ross from NSW commented:

Offering an eftpos card as a carrot to join HCF(plus extras) is a joke!. As a single 77year old I am battling to cover my basic hospital needs without even considering "extras" A $100 eftpos card is barely a months premium. How about shopping round for a meaningful offer? 

margaret
margaret from NSW replied to Ross:

Er, yes, but meaningful to whom? Oh you meant meaningful to YOU. 

Karen
Karen from NSW commented:

"The Consumers Health Forum wants to see a nationally standard and legislated health insurance product, it calls myCover, for basic hospital policies which all health funds would have to offer." As long as the correct relevant conditions, syndromes, diseases etc are covered by the relevant age groups e.g. NO IVF, fertility, pregnancy or related conditions for ANYONE over 50 (male or female) and joint replacement IS covered for example, then it could be a good thing. It would have to meet expectations of private health cover (private room, private hospital, NO GAP) and set standard minimum levels of cover. BUT this only works if the services people actually require are included even at a basic level. If you want more services e.g. gourmet meals, purely cosmetic procedures e.g. liposuction then those are additions that the insurance companies charge extra for. Likewise, extras cover; there could be a 'standard' extras package that includes only say dental, optical, physio, prescriptions, nutritionists, prosthetics etc and removes gym shoes, massage, chiropractic, yoga, pilates, aromatherapy etc that could be packaged for the 'worried well' and charged accordingly. In addition an excess for poor lifestyle choices should also be considered - or this could be a discount for not smoking, maintaining healthy weight, exercising etc. Not all over 50s have a catalogue of conditions and likewise not all under 50s have healthy lifestyles. 

Comment Guidelines