News

NewsDon't Count Your Chickens Yet
Don't Count Your Chickens Yet

Don't Count Your Chickens Yet

Yet again retirement incomes policy has dominated the Budget with what’s been billed the largest change to superannuation for 10 years.

But beware of feeling too safe when you read about the hits only affecting the very wealthy and their $1 million plus  retirement balances.

Those of more modest means who seek to top up their super may be in for shock when they begin to understand how another little change affects them…

THE HIDDEN NASTY?

Generally the pundits have welcomed the changes as rebalancing the superannuation system concessions away from the wealthy.

Indeed the Treasurer has claimed 96% of Australians with super will be unaffected or even better off as a result of the changes.

I don’t believe I’m in the top 4% of income earners and my super balance is nothing to write home about, but over-50s should be aware of one  ‘reform’ which could cost them.

All those aged over-50 can now top up their super to the tune of $35,000 a year out of their pre-tax income with what’s know as the “concessional cap”.

There can be few bonuses money-wise of getting on in life but this is one. The under-50s have a cap of $30,000.

The super system hasn’t been around long enough to allow many over-50s to have enough in their balances. Hence a top-up provision helps.

You’d be forgiven for missing it but both concessions (for over and under 50s) will now be cut to $25,000 by July 2017.

In the later years of your working life that can make a big difference. Many average wage earners once they have paid off the mortgage and the kids have left home plan to make such payments.

If both members of a couple are working the $10,000 reduction in the cap could end up costing them around  $3,000 - $5,000 in additional tax, depending on their tax bracket, to get the same amount of money into super.

It’s not a question of how ‘rich’ you are. There are all sorts of reasons why someone over 50 has to top up their super.

As Wednesday’s The Australian reported on the front page, it’s  “….a highly controversial move that limits the scope of  all workers to build up their retirement nest eggs.”

I’m waiting to hear from my financial planner (and yes it does make sense to have one so long as they are properly trained and trustworthy), to get to grips with the impact on my plans.

Click Here to take our Budget & Election Poll and have your say on the changes

WHAT’S NEXT?

Meanwhile there’s billions of dollars more in savings and spending cuts still to be announced before the planned July 2 election, so don’t count your chickens just yet.

Treasurer Scott Morrison hasn’t taken the advice of FiftyUp Club members who in the Club’s Budget & Election poll said the government  ‘needs to stop moving the goal posts.’

Take the Poll

Last year Joe Hockey tightened the eligibility for the aged pension, which saw some 325,000 older Australians lose some or all of the part pension.

This year it’s a smaller and much wealthier group who are losing some tax concessions around super and a wider group who’ll also pay more to top up their next eggs.

In the FiftyUp Club Budget & Election Poll so far you’ve told us:

  • Almost 49% want governments to ‘stop moving the goalposts’, and
  • Another 14%  say ‘Leave them alone, it’s their money and they saved it’, but
  • 30% argued the tax breaks ‘are not fair and should be cut back.’

As with last year’s budget it took a while for older Australians to appreciate the impact of the pension eligibility changes.

Expect more of the same this year. Many who would not see themselves as the super-wealthy may face paying higher taxes and caps around their superannuation.

 

FiftyUp Club Pty Ltd (ACN 166 905 175) is a Corporate Authorised Representative (AR number 465649) of One Big Switch Pty Ltd (ACN 150 963 474) who holds its own Australian Financial Services License (AFSL 455982) and can provide you with factual information and general advice only. If in doubt about your personal situation or needs you should seek personal financial advice.

 

 

 

Originally posted on .

Join the conversation

FiftyUp Club
Don't Count Your Chickens Yet

Share your views with other members. 

Want to leave a comment? or .
Read our moderation policy here.
Graham
Graham from VIC commented:

Graham from Vict. After retiring in 2000 as a result of a WPA. on 56% super. that should have been 68% of my salary after 28 years of service; on 16-1-2016 centrelink took $59.00 off both my wife and my PART pensions; And now 'the lord only knows and maybe the ATO' what we will loose this time, 

Perry
Perry from NSW commented:

The $1.6M cap is ill conceived For a conservative retiree invested in fixed deposit it earns just $39,200 A politician retired on $200,000pa ,if not payed for by the taxpayer, would need $8M invested .Where is the fairness in this? The drawdown amounts need review P.Woodlands 

Perry
Perry from NSW commented:

The $1.6M cap is ill conceived For a conservative retiree invested in fixed deposit it earns just $39,200 A politician retired on $200,000pa ,if not payed for by the taxpayer, would need $8M invested .Where is the fairness in this? The drawdown amounts need review 

James e
James e from NSW commented:

The Governments Labour and Liberal want people to be less relaible on Age Pension. Before retirement we tried to do just that by saving and topping up our superanutaion We are now being penalised yet again Why did we bother The Governments keep changing the goal posts 

Gertraud
Gertraud from ACT commented:

Yawn! We have already had a $25,000 cap for all ages in the past under Gillard in 2012/13! The world didn't end then and it won't this time round either. People with spare cash may have to pay a bit more tax, but if they are really serious about boosting their super accounts, there is always the option of non-concessional contributions of up to $150,000 per annum! Once in the fund, those contributions benefit from the same low taxation as concessional contributions. 

Karen
Karen from NSW commented:

Its the TTR changes that will affect me personally since I am using that strategy now and maximising the $35000 concessional contribution (including employer contribution) by salary sacrificing. It is the only way I had any chance of making up super prior to retirement. being 61 there are not many years left to catch up! Now like Christopher, I need to consult my financial planner to see what I can do. 

Deborah
Deborah from NSW commented:

Whether Liberal or Labour, both are short-sighted when it concerns superannuation. But then again, neither would be concerned because what they need is money NOW. When we retire (if, in fact, we can EVER retire), we can't support ourselves on our superannuation and more and more of us have to rely on a pension, the current politicians will be long gone and the government of the day will blame the previous governments for their short-sighted policies. What then? Death duties and Land Tax. 

Someone
Someone from NSW commented:

My husband is 6 years of retirement salary sacrifice topping up to 35 thousand as of 2017 we are going to be over 2 thousand dollars worse off and probably now have to rely on a part pension or work longer all because we are careful with our money enabling us to top up super 

Comment Guidelines