News

News Couples aged over 65 with own home are the ‘richest Australians’
 Couples aged over 65 with own home are the ‘richest Australians’

 Couples aged over 65 with own home are the ‘richest Australians’

Hilda is a name derived from an old Norse word meaning ‘battle’ and HILDA is an acronym for research into household wealth which fired up its own intergenerational stoush this week.

The researchers at the University of Melbourne unveiled their latest data from the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia, or Hilda, survey of 17,000 Australians.

The headline findings were the declining rate of home ownership, mostly blamed on ballooning prices, with the proportion of owner occupied homes dropping from 69% in 2001 to 65% in 2014.

On the individual level almost 52% of all those aged over 18 now own a home, down from 57% in 2002, and the report predicts in the near future less than half of adults will be home owners.

It led to a number of agencies, including the FiftyUp Club, to call for a housing affordability summit to find out why fewer Australians own their own home and what might be done about it.

The reasons are of course numerous: an undersupply of houses, foreign investors, some argue negative gearing, the policy settings which encourage older Australians to stay put in their homes etc

But in between the figures there was good news at least for some older Australians. In the words of a former British prime minister it could be said they’ve “Never had it so good.”

For example the report found:

*80% of homes headed by someone aged 65 and up are owner occupied. For 25-34 year olds the figure is 47%.

*The household wealth of those aged over 65 grew by almost a quarter between 2006-2014 from $535,000 to $656,000. But for those households headed by those aged under 54 their wealth grew smaller.

*In real terms house prices have risen by 90% since 2001 and couples aged 65+ who’d bought their own home could be considered the ‘richest Australians’

*And the mean value of  superannuation accounts rose from $112,000 in 2002 to $186,000 in 2014 putting super only second to the home as  the most valuable family asset.

Of course not all of those aged 65 and over are this well-off and most  have children and grandchildren who are struggling with home affordability and other cost-of-living pressures.

History might have been kind to this older cohort but now, as the chill winds of budget deficits and downturns blow down the national neck, expect a real Hilda-style battle about the distribution of this accumulated wealth.

 

 

 

 

Originally posted on .

Join the conversation

FiftyUp Club
 Couples aged over 65 with own home are the ‘richest Australians’

Share your views with other members. 

Want to leave a comment? or .
Read our moderation policy here.
Maria
Maria from VIC commented:

I sympathise with you Amanda. I have just turned 50 and am a single lady who also cannot save for a home of my own, because of having to pay high rents for many years. Mari 

Belinda
Belinda from QLD commented:

It was only a few years ago that the younger people were saying they didn't ever want to own a house - renting allowed them to pay for what they viewed as the important things like travel, nice cars and entertainment (all short term expenses without any thought to a growing asset). They can't have it both ways. The figures show less younger housing ownership, not just because of house prices but often because of short term financial choices. The Govt. can't look at penalising older Australians because of "mistakes" made by younger people. 

neil
neil from QLD commented:

What about the ones that are around sixty and will be paying off their home for the rest of their lives. 

Gertraud
Gertraud from ACT commented:

47 % of 25-34 year olds are owner occupiers. That sounds about right, considering that a very large percentage of them are still living (rent free) with mum and dad, most are single and don't want to be tied down with a mortgage as it means they have less money for important things like travel. What would be interesting to know would be how many of them are landlords while they themselves rent. 

Marianne
Marianne from NSW commented:

This topic raises its head every 10 years or so. I would strongly suggest to the young people to stop wanting all the bells and whistles from the start. Just buy a home that will be sufficient for the next 5 to 10 years and then look to a bigger and better one. Plenty of young people want to live right on the door step of all that is hip and happening, perhaps they need to rethink the idea of owning a stand alone home and consider the alternatives such as apartment living. We need to bear in mind the urban sprawl is now encroaching into our prime farming areas, a loss of farms means less production of food grown here and more imports also equating to a loss of employment. City dwelling parents need to actually have a good look at what is being offered by new home builders, can you remember seeing a lovely display that did not have stones benches, latest and greatest of everything. Perhaps if the attitude of I want it now was put aside by our younger generation, made do with what they have, not try to keep up with the latest ect, they would actually be able to afford a home. It does not matter who buys a property, it will sell to who ever is willing to pay the highest price. Investors never want to pay a high price, this cuts into the capacity to make a capital gain when it is time to sell up. 

bruce
bruce from NSW commented:

A ban on cash strapped foreign inverstors need to be implemented now. This I believe is pushing the market prices up, I cant see my children ever being able to afford a home. We need to look out for the people who live here, not foreign investors who do not live here and pay taxes. 

Peter
Peter from QLD commented:

The government or should I say Melcolm Turnbull is not listening to the silent majority. Any policy that back dates to 2007 is recipricol. He is treating us like idiots. He has lost plenty of us and will lose plenty more even though I don't believe the super policy will get through the senate as it is just bad policy. As a lifetime liberal I am moving. I pray that One Nation or the likes nominates a candidate in my electorate in future elections. Good riddance Liberal party. You have overseen the loss of interest rates on our savings and now you want to get your hands on our money to implement your outdated "nanny state" idealogy just like Labor. Self funded seniors have had enough. 

Someone
Someone from QLD commented:

Harry of QLD.I am 85 y.o , I had no money and my prospects were bad at age 25 as I had a serious ailment which left me with heart problems. I was a bad prospect for a housing loan. My eldest sister lent me 20Pound for a deposit on a building block. My wife then (fiancé) paid the instalments. I did have a job at pound per week when not in hospital and worked on building my own house personally. WE worked on that house day and night, and I spent another several months in hospital. WE eventually mortgaged that house to buy a business although my Doctor said that I should take out an invalid pension. Over a period of fifty years we managed to purchase assets which allow us a comfortable living although the heart still threatens me. When (INVITED ) to apply for a pension several years ago I was told I did not comply. I am now 85 years old and have to work til I drop As I have a few Small assets. 

Amanda
Amanda from VIC commented:

I would love to be able to buy a home but my husband and I are in our low 50's and because we are renters we have not been able to save up for a deposit. Unfortunately we are doomed to remain renters 

Comment Guidelines