News

NewsTariff's Will Be Rolled Back From September
Tariff's Will Be Rolled Back From September

Tariff's Will Be Rolled Back From September

The cost of energy continues to affect our members with many of you converting to solar panels when the generous feed-in tariffs were introduced.

The tariffs were introduced for a set period to kickstart Australia’s uptake of rooftop solar by offering money to solar users who fed energy back into the grid.

A report on the ABC has found more than 275,000 households will be affected when the tariffs are unwound from September to January in New South Wales, South Australia and Victoria.

Reece Turner from Solar Citizens, a non-profit which has 80,000 members across Australia, said the households affected would be primarily older consumers sensitive to the price of electricity.

The electricity bill shock will be, on average $1,500 and 146,000 NSW customers will be hardest hit where the tariff will be wound back from 60 cents for all solar generation to 5.5-7.2 cents per kilowatt hour.

Damien Moyse, of the Alternative Technology Association, said the people with the more generous feed-in tariffs bought their solar panels when they were far more expensive than they are now.

In Victoria, consumers who were paid 25 cents per kilowatt hour for excess solar fed into the grid will have that reduced to five cents and in South Australia the 16 cent tariff will fall to 6.8 cents.

Reece Turner said the rollback for the tariffs pointed to the need for sweeping changes to the national energy market.

“At the moment I can’t just buy electricity from my neighbour, it has to go through a retailer and it’s highly regulated,” Mr Turner said.

“We’d like to see ways that individuals can buy and sell energy from each other and that will ultimately benefit the people who have solar, but also those who don’t, because electricity will become cheaper.”

Consumers urged not to make rash decisions

The report warns consumers away from rushing into decisions about how to mitigate the impact, advising that batteries are still too expensive and will not reap the financial rewards for households in the short term.

It also suggests households should consider switching their gas appliances to electric and to make sure they have smart meters installed.

Sarah McNamara, of the Australian Energy Council, said the rollback of the tariffs is an opportunity for retailers to offer competitive rates.

“What customers should be doing is looking at their retailers and what sort of usage charges apply and what sort of feed-in tariffs they’re offering, and what other bits and pieces might be part of the package a retailer is offering,” she told the ABC.

“And in NSW, the availability of smart meters should give more information to households to enable them to manage their energy use to keep their bills down.”

Mr Turner said he expected a spike in the interest of battery storage when the tariffs are rolled back.

“We will also see potentially people buying more solar panels because these people have up until now been prohibited from adding to their systems,” he said.

 

Originally posted on .

Join the conversation

FiftyUp Club
Tariff's Will Be Rolled Back From September

Share your views with other members. 

Want to leave a comment? or .
Read our moderation policy here.
Someone
Someone from SA commented:

What you have said is not quite right when I got my Sola the SA government guarantee 0.50 cents for 25.years for the feed in tariff so now you are saying the government is going to brake that agreement. Trevorgillian1@bigpond.com 

Monty
Monty from QLD commented:

I fully subscribe to the principle of alternative energy sources, as a consequence, a move was necessary and we sought and found a suitable residence in the Redcliffe area of Qld which had PVP's installed. We were initially credited at .50cents/kWh over two quarters, our retailer informed us the feed-in tariffe would be reduced to .06cents/kWh with effect from the next quarter ending 31/7/16. This huge reduction is a disincentive flying in the face of the need for alternative energy, at the time of writing the generator is pocketing free eletricity with the retailer paying the feed-in tariffe - how equitable is this when the charge-out tariffe by the genrator is 277% greater than the feed-in tariffe? This is an acute problem facing any home buyer buying resale properties in Qld, fitted with PVP's, in my opinion the feed-tariffe should be 33.33% of the forfeited rate of .50cents/kWh with increases geared to the generator's price hikes. 

John
John from QLD commented:

Queensland users who have a signed contract until 2028 don't have too much to worry about because if they break the contracted price per KW generated you would see a massive class action take place to reimburse those users for the differential. It was a suggestion put forward by the previous government and very quickly shied away from it when the facts were presented. So god willing our .44c per KW feed back into the grid looks safe until 2028. 

Kristine
Kristine from NSW commented:

This really stinks. Im sick of the greed that governments and large companies employ to keep their stock holders happy. What about the rest of us???? 

keith
keith from NSW commented:

What are smart meters ? 

Lynray
Lynray from NSW replied to keith:

another way to get more out of the household. Dont trust smart meters look at the story in Victoria 

Gertraud
Gertraud from ACT replied to keith:

A smart meter measures the electricity used at specified times of the day based on demand. The hours between 7 am - 9 am and 5 pm - 8 pm represent the peak hours during which most household use most electricity, in-between time is between 9 am and 5 pm and economy time is between 8 pm and 7 am. A smart meter was installed when my solar was connected, though there is just one rate for consumption and one rate for the gross feed-in from solar. 

Susan
Susan from QLD commented:

What about Queensland? 

Carol
Carol from QLD replied to Susan:

Yes, how does this effect Queenslanders? 

Gertraud
Gertraud from ACT commented:

I would say that the statement "NSW customers will be hardest hit where the tariff will be wound back from 60 cents for all solar generation to 5.5-7.2 cents per kilowatt hour" is a bit misleading! Households on the 60 cents FIT will have more than recovered the original cost of their solar installation since their installation and they will continue to enjoy the benefits of the energy generated on their roof tops. I had a 1.5 kW system installed when my home was built in the ACT in 2009 and I broke even in less than 4 years and since then the panels have earned more than $2,500 - I'm on a gross FIT of 50 cents per kW. Even without the generous FIT, which has another 13 years to run unless the ACT government cuts it prematurely, I draw 1/3 of my total electricity from solar! I am waiting for batteries to come down in costs and intend to install a second system of 5 kW with battery, this system would provide all of the daytime energy my home uses and the excess would be sent to the battery in the first instance and once the battery is full, any excess would be fed into the grid. The existing 1.5 kW system would remain as it is currently, with all of the energy it produces being fed into the grid at 50 cents. 

Someone
Someone from NSW replied to Gertraud:

Congratulations Gertrude that you have been able to recover the cost of installation. However although I'm on 0.60 cents per KWH for a 2.2 KW sytem when the roll back commences I will still be heavily out of pocket. So not all of us wil be as fortunate as you Robin from NSW 

Gertraud
Gertraud from ACT commented:

I find it hard to believe that you haven't recovered the initial outlay for your system. If you are on the 60 cents gross feed in tariff, your system must have been installed by October 2010 at the latest, so that's 6 years of receiving 60 cents! To calculate, you need to multiply the meter reading for solar by 60 cents and then deduct the cost of the system. I have just taken a look at my electricity meter and since 31 January 2010 when the system started, it has produced 13,645 kW @ $0.5005 per kW I have received a return of $6,829.32, which is $2,829.32 more than I paid for the system. If I was paid 60 cents for the electricity generated by my 1.5 kW system, I would have been paid $8,187! 

Lyn
Lyn from NSW commented:

Robin, I'm with you, we will be out of pocket in NSW from 1/1/17 as will have horrendous, future per KWH charges on usage with little credit for what we collect on own equipment. And I thought it was ACT where the sun don't shine. Must be if their scheme continues for another 13 yrs at 0. 50c/KWH. Presumably our politicians looked after their interests first again. 

Gary
Gary from NSW commented:

I wish the cation government would get with it, and do more to promote solar energy, instead of wanting to keep on with polluting coal mines. This won't happen until the coalition is kicked out of office. 

Someone
Someone from VIC commented:

I think this is all a lot of BS it's another way for the government to take what rightly belongs to the people ,who invested into solar power. 

Marianne
Marianne from NSW commented:

I have no sympathy for anyone who put on solar just to get the $0.60 cent tariff, how stupid were you. I currently have 24 solar panels on my roof and a 5 kw inverter and I do not get the $0.60 cent tariff and I am still winning. My purpose of having solar was to offset the cost of having a swimming pool, running my household etc. When I had them installed I was told do not rely on tariffs, use the power you create during the by washing, running your pool pump, dishwasher etc during the day, any power you generate and don't use will go to the grid. At night we draw down from the grid. My power bills are never more than $175 per quarter, our house size is 30 sqs, our pool is 55,000 gallons. All this so called bill shock has come about because of greed and the lack of using common sense. Easy way to avoid any bill shock and it is what I do, set up a Bpay payment for each service provider, council, water, electricity, health insurance, telephone to come out of my sbank account To work out how much to pay I just took the bills for each provider over the previous year added what I was charged by each put another 10% divided by 26 and that became my installment amount. No one has complained about me doing this, I never asked them if it was OK and I will not stop doing this. For those who are not using Click Energy see if you can join them, my feed in is 10c per Kw hr. 

margaret
margaret from NSW replied to Marianne:

Well, yes and no. Some pensioners with not too much in their retirement fund were not in a position to be worrying about a private swimming pool but did want to invest some of the little they had responsibly yet wisely. They thought that if they could protect the environment whilst generating a little income then, they had made a wise investment decision. The advice about bill paying is highly useful , but only if one is still generating enough money to use any method of bill paying. What I do find useful is to remember not everyone has the same income and this is not always due to being useless lazy bludgers, but rather is due to a lifetime of doing those low paid jobs we all want done and want someone else to do them. 

Marianne
Marianne from NSW replied to margaret:

Totally understand what you are saying Margaret. However when one purchased their solar panels it was part of the responsibility of the supplier to advise those buying of the phase out date for the Government offer. I still stand by what I said as installing solar panels was not and is not a wise financial investment, I feel sure that a financial adviser would have told anyone that, perhaps as a short term money making idea and most definitely not any form of sound long term investment. Those who have installed simply for the feed-in money have not applied good financial reasoning at all. As to my private pool, well it was in my home when I bought it, I do not swim nor does my husband, so it remains purely for family and friends to enjoy. I could see no sensible or sound reason to pay to have it removed, when it will may well be one of the selling attractions when the time comes for us to sell up and head into some form of care. I have not implied some people were lazy bludgers, you are not alone in being one of those who was in low paying employment for the best part of their lives. My lovely superannuation payment came at great cost to me, I was retired due to ill health caused by my employment, no workers compensation was payable. Neither my partner nor myself have ever held jobs that paid more than $40,000 per annum for a 40 hr week. It is just simple hard darn work on my part that we have our reasonably comfortable lifestyle and I still apply those basic rules which my late grandfather taught me. My only comment to you is check out the following websites: https://www.moneysmart.gov.au/managing-your-money/managing-debts/financial-counselling http://www.financialcounsellingaustralia.org.au/corporate/find-a-counsellor https://salvos.org.au/need-help/financial-assistance/financial-counselling/ http://www.fcan.com.au/ All of the above can be helpful when trying to balance the family finances. 

Comment Guidelines