News

News40 years after Gough, are we better off?
40 years after Gough, are we better off?

40 years after Gough, are we better off?

gough-whitlamDear Fellow Members,

The death of Gough Whitlam this week (may he rest in peace), had all of us thinking of different times.

Like many FiftyUps, you may have found yourself rewinding 40 years and reminiscing about how different it was to live in Australia in the mid-1970s.

At the FiftyUp Club, conversation turned to whether we were better off.

In 1974 we were paying 30 cents for a litre of milk.

We were outraged when Federal Treasurer Frank Crean upped the price of a postage stamp from 10 cents to 18 cents.

A loaf of white bread cost 24 cents, and a kilo of rump steak was $3.24.

And petrol was less than 20c/Litre before the 1970s oil shock.

Ah, the good old days, when the average male income was about $150 per week, the age pension was $26 per person and so was the dole.

The average house price in the capital cities was just under $30,000.

Are we better off since the days of Gough as PM?

Today we pay $1.50 on average for a litre of milk – that’s 5 times the 1974 price (and no doubt it’s being kept low by the big supermarket discount wars on milk).

An average loaf of bread is $2.93, which is more than 12 times the 1974 price, despite the supermarket wars.

We hardly use stamps anymore, but they’re 70c – that’s almost four times the 1974 price. But email is much cheaper, fortunately.

Petrol is 8 times the price at an average of $1.50.

The average price of a home in 2014 is about $550,000 – which is 18 times what it was back then!

Overall, the Consumer Price Index calculated by the Australia Bureau of Statistics has risen from 14.7 in 1974 to 105.9 today, which is a little over 7-fold.

But Australians’ average weekly earnings are about $1500, which is 10 times what it was in 1974. The aged pension is now a bit over $400 or about 15 times the 1974 rate.

So theoretically, we should feel better off. Some boffins like this one argue we just spend more and expect more these days. But is it as simple as that? We think not.

We paid upfront for healthcare before Medicare (or Medibank, as it was first called), but we weren’t paying an average private health insurance bill per couple of over $3000 in 1974.

There was no such thing as a broadband bill back then, or a $2000-per-household power bill – as some of us now pay.

Gough was a political locomotive in a hurry to reform Australia by crashing through or crashing. Fortunately there are many positive legacies, and they were affectionately acknowledged by all sides after news of his passing age 98.

As Tony Abbott said yesterday: “Whether you were for him or against him, it was his vision that drove our politics then and which still echoes through our public life four decades on.”

But governments since the 1970s are kidding themselves if they think they’ve done their job by making us all better off since Gough.

As FiftyUps we can be grateful for Medicare, free Education, Women’s Rights and the Rights of our Aborigines.

But we should keep campaigning for governments around Australia to keep one eye on what it costs to live in this wonderful country of ours.

Originally posted on .

Join the conversation

FiftyUp Club
40 years after Gough, are we better off?

Share your views with other members. 

Want to leave a comment? or .
Read our moderation policy here.
Eve
Eve from NSW commented:

No we are not better off, and Medicare was the worst thing he bought in. We had a very good health system, if you could afford a health fund you paid ino one, if you couldnt the government looked after you. Now it costs a fortune to have health care fund, a fortune for the gap between drs bills and refund given. People who could afford health fubnd, dont bother or pay but still use the government system Its a mess.- he was arrogent 

Roslyn
Roslyn from NSW commented:

No - Gough signed the Lima Declaration, whether we liked it or not - linking us to Globalisation - it hasn't worked. The idea was for the rich countries to help the poor countries - only the "poor" countries have been given too much trade freedom and buying our land and assets. He also created the giant list of Welfare beneficeries that we cannot afford today - and all that did was lower peoples self esteem and put them in the too hard basket. I don't think he was any good at all! 

bob
bob from NSW commented:

He was the worst thing to happen to this country. He stuffed it well and truly .And it has never recovered. 

Therese
Therese from NSW commented:

It foolish to compare then with now. The world is a totally different one to what we knew then...it's like comparing the 16th century with the twenty first! Everything seemed cheaper in the time of Gough who squandered the Treasury and changed Australia's way of thinking that we should all have our hands out so Governments can give us everything we want for nothing and without having to work for it! Today the Labor movement is still following Gough's way of doing things, despite the fact that we are 300,000,000 dollars in debt and rising everyday we wake up. Governments do not give citizens anything. It is the Taxpayer that does. If we go back a few years before Gough took over...people expected nothing for nothing but worked hard to achieve what they ended up with. Now the Labor Movement complains that the rich should hand all their hard earned dollars to the so called poor because they refuse to work. People today want everything 'yesterday" ! Before Gough got on the scene people worked to get want they needed and then for what they wanted and that's what it should be now! Those who want everything for nothing or who have everything and want more are only thinking for themselves and not for the future of our wonderful country which had been built through blood sweat and tears. We should all be thinking of the next generation who will have to shoulder the burden of debt brought about by the Gough Whitlams of this world and their followers. i now pity mt grand children! 

Cecilia
Cecilia from NSW commented:

Yes, Gough was a politicians who had set his mind of changing our country for the better. He did not make any differences between rich and poor. I live in Cabramatta, knew Gough and Margaret - who was taken over the patronage of our music club. They both mixed with the public, be it dancing or anything else. We might have many other following or previous prime ministers - they might be long forgotten, but no one will ever forget our Gough. The only pity was he did not surround himself with the right people and one had not left him enough time to adjust himself in his position as labor prime minister. RIP Gough, had you known how many people loved you.. Cecilia Hoppenjans 

Michael
Michael from QLD commented:

The time was ripe for a nation desperate for change and growth, we chose well, our pains many, arguments noisy and loud but WOW look at us now we have grown, still a little frighted by change but so confident and proud 

O P
O P from VIC commented:

Without doubt Whitlam was a big man with big ideas, but big ideas only come with big costs, which have to be paid for by (in this case) the taxpayer, As a taxpayer during this period I was not prepared to see my hard earned spent on his flamboyant, extravagant policies, that is why when his government was sacked, I like many others voted his regime out at the next election, we could see his direction would put Australia's economy into long term jeopardy. Why there is a view that he was a great leader is beyond me, in my view he rates very close to the Gillard, Rudd eras, which we all know left a lot to be desired. 

John
John from NSW commented:

Heather: The head of the chines government is worth millions. Putin's daughter is worth 10 times that of ANY Australian Poli. Putin himself could buy and sell Canberra! Check your facts before you follow the failed ideology of socialism 

jennifer
jennifer from NSW commented:

I think you have opened a Pandora's box John!! I must say that when I left NEW ZEALAND in the 60's as a freshly licenced nurse together with 5 other nurses to live in this wonderful country of Australia I have to say that yes everything was totally different. I don't know though yet Wether that was good or bad. Then there were no jobs to be had for us then.it did not matter how trained we were. The first one to get employment paid the rent.we all finally got work at different departments at David Jones. I sold handker chiefs!!! We left our native country where all medical procedures were free!!! A bed in our new hospitals were free for everyone even for our governor general of the day. We lived in a house next door to a well known council man and his sergeant major wife!!and he in his spare time pedophile who attacked poor little girls was found out and the whole thing was swept under the carpet because he was inportant and no-one knew what it all meant. I have only just started could write a book. I will not go into the cost of anything now would take too long.except to say that by the start of 1980 I bought a house and the interest rate was 19 per cent.don't know how I did it. I don't know if it was better then or cheaper then than now. I will say though that I have been here for 50 odd years and still love it here. Whether things are better or worse now I will not say.will leave that for another day.Gough Whitlam (god rest his soul) did have great vision but was not given the time to see it through. Then of course we had we had Bob Hawke.Keating.and how about Menzies. Then of course was Mr. Howard. I hope this country stays a great country. It's up to us and great leaders. I will say though keep away Rudd and Gillard. I think for them it was a little game with us as the stake. 

William
William from NSW commented:

When I arrived in NSW in 1973, seven cents would buy a local pay telephone call (with slots for 2 and 5 cent coins),, a daily newspaper, a postage stamp and an Orange Frosty ice block. In the pub a schooner cost 33 cents and a middy was 24 cents. In those days, a schooner was reputed to contain 15 ounces and a middy ten. Today a 375 ML can ( 13 ounces?) just about fills a schooner glass of today. Does anyone have any of the old schooner glasses that had a 15 marked on the outside? A comparison of capacity would prove interesting. I suspect that an unanticipated consequence of metrification resulted in a reduction in the size of these servings. 

Comment Guidelines