News

NewsPoliticians are both out-of-touch and spend too much of our money on entitlements
Politicians are both out-of-touch and spend too much of our money on entitlements

Politicians are both out-of-touch and spend too much of our money on entitlements

It’s become the angry corner of the Fair Go For the FiftyUps campaign with many respondents spitting chips at what they see as the ultimate hypocrisy and unfair go.

The target of their contempt isn’t power companies or banks but politicians they feel are riding the high hog in Canberra while passing judgement over their financial futures.

Every day brings more fuel to the fire with stories of excessive overseas business class travel, charter flights and office and entertaining ‘expenses’.

One NSW Liberal MP John Sidoti is seeking to reinstate an even more generous super parliamentary scheme. The existing one already costs $25 million a year.

One campaign member John spoke for many Politicians need to give some leadership and lead by example...no special rules for politicians on cost of living issues like superannuation rules.’

At the very same time we hear more policy wonks suggesting the family home should be included in the pension assets tests, more calls for a review of retirement incomes and superannuation tax breaks

We asked you, and so far more than 12,000 have been good enough to answer, a series of questions about what cost of living pressures hurt most and why.

There’s still another two weeks to go so if you haven’t please take a few minutes to add your voice to the many valuable contributions which we shall proudly deliver to Canberra.

The preliminary results suggest some pollies have some explaining to do if they claim to represent your best interests as opposed to their own or that of their party.

When asked do you think politicians understand cost of living pressures felt by the over-50s 90% answered a big ‘NO, they are out of touch’.

The next largest response was from 8% who reckoned ‘Yes but there’s not much they can do about it’.

When asked which single policy was the most important to your financial situation a resounding 44% went for the family home remaining exempt from the pension assets test.

The next largest sector was the 17% who nominated no changes to the taxation of superannuation. And as we’ve seen both policies are seriously being questioned by those with the resolve to keep pushing for change.

The simple message from you so far: the politicians making important decisions about all of our lives are both out-of-touch and spend too much of our money to entitlements such as travel.

 Judging by her post if Glenda from NSW was to join us in Canberra, and we hope some campaign members can, she’d let fly with both barrels;  ‘I hope Fair Go for the FiftyUp Campaign will fight on the grounds that a rule for one is a rule for all that includes politicians also. What makes them think that they are a cut above the rest - that they can take from us the retirees, and not apply the same ruling to themselves?’

It’s a simple question from which it’s hard to get a straight answer. Why should older Australians be asked to tighten their belts when it appears far too often those making the decision need to loosen theirs?

Check out these comments from your peers in the Fifty Up Club and add some of your own;

Robert, NSW - Politicians should have the same rules and regulations as the general public when it comes to superannuation and the likes. These people are being paid by the public so why should they have different rules to the public at large. Entitlements rules for politicians should also be scrapped completely, no more study trips, if invited to a function let the cost be paid by the organiser.

Barry, VICTORIA - Politicians need to look in other areas for savings , perhaps their own backyards and leave and alone the people who have worked hard and provided for their retiring years. 

If you would like a more active role in this campaign, email us and let us know. We may gather a group of keen participants to join us in Canberra when we present the submission. You may also leave your comments below;

Originally posted on .

Join the conversation

FiftyUp Club
Politicians are both out-of-touch and spend too much of our money to entitlements

Share your views with other members. 

Want to leave a comment? or .
Read our moderation policy here.
Alfred M
Alfred M from QLD commented:

It does not seem to matter which of the big sides of Politics are in power, they just cannot keep their snouts out of the trough. They are greedy, criminal, robbers of taxpayers money. There is hardly a honest one among them, surely it is time for the people to demand honesty from them, or sack them from the position. If they worked for private companies, and carried on the same way, as they do in parliament, they would be out on their backside and unemployed. 

Rhonda
Rhonda from NSW commented:

The Ixlamic State has no politicians. They do not tolerate or respect democracy. They are well organised. They have their eyes on Australia. They have control over huge amounts of money. Their leaders do not have perks like Retirement Funds and Biz Class travel. We don't want to be like that but the way we are going, we'll end up as a two-bit nation with no direction and maybe, just maybe with a leader who hates us - passionately. Albert An Aussie. NSW. 

Janelle
Janelle from NSW commented:

This is the only job in the world that I know of where you continue to draw your equivalent wage after you finish. To insult us further, ministers or those who loose their seat or even retire are appointed to high paying government posts, jobs or boards. Sophie Mirrabella is a classic example. All the while they are receiving their super and now collecting another high paying salary with outrageous perks. As we all know, if you are on any sort of benefit for every $2 you earn you loose $1 of your benefit. The same rules and regulations need to be applied to these hypocritical politicians. They should also be bound be age regulations when accessing their super just like we are. I am so fed up with them continually having their snouts in the trough and at the same time looking for new ways to screw the people even more. Enough is enough! These despicable so called leaders need to be held to account and that needs to happen NOW. We can no longer afford to keep paying increasing costs for electricity, gas, water, medical, food etc when incomes are in fact decreasing. Cutting politicians lerks and perks, ever increasing staff, advisors, media personal, com cars, overseas travel to name a few would save the tax payer an absolute fortune. Instead of overseas study tours, pick up the phone, technology is so advanced they don't need to travel, they can have a video link to get the same information. 

Joy Anne
Joy Anne from QLD commented:

have been saying this for months, WHY should the retiring Politian's get a pension for life of nearly 8 times the normal pensioners get. When Politian's retire they should go on the same pension as us and see if they can live on what they give us. Their tune would change. But also they probably have enough from all the perks and money they received during their terms. The only difference between home owners pension and pensioners who pay a huge rent is the $125 rental assistance which covers nothing. They keep telling us that we have to tighten the belt, well WHY does that not apply to them. They keep putting costs up and the pensioners get nothing and they get huge pay rises. How is this even when pensioners keep getting squeezed to pay out more and find they cannot live. I think I got $5 rise last year. HA HA Come on people, we need hundreds more to take to Canberra. Joy Anne Joy Anne Bourke 

Raymond
Raymond from NSW commented:

Job Vacancy Australian Politician Must have an understanding of the Australia economy and understand the needs of the Australian people. Current politicians need not apply 

Andrew
Andrew from QLD commented:

Animal Farm. 

Jenny
Jenny from NSW replied to Andrew:

Exactly! Just like the book, isn't it. 

Jenny
Jenny from NSW replied to Andrew:

Exactly! Just like the book, isn't it. 

Someone
Someone from QLD commented:

Politicians should be entitled to their superannuation just like everyone else and it is absolutely absurd to be able to take it the minute they leave parliament. Wait till retirement age like everyone else. Just don't expect politicians to change the rules to disadvantage their perk. The simple other area to focus on is the mining companies not paying their fair taxes but operating off shore. Address that area and we would care what the politician perks were. 

Ivan
Ivan from VIC commented:

Dear Christopher, I am in total agreement with what you say about politicians using too much of taxpayers money, they SHOULD not be given a card where they use it like toilet paper,they MUST apply for allowance a long before they spend,if they looking for money to fix the country, well, that is surely their chance.Not only that if they wrong the party ,whichever one it is,that member should be suspended until resolved with the provision that the individual pays his/hers lawyers fees and returns all the money in question,if not the Government should be allowed to sell their assets even if it is their house ,car etc until fully paid. Also the perks they get in retirement should be scrapped at once,it a laughing matter ,but not for the taxpayer. Regards, Ivan 

jennifer
jennifer from VIC commented:

The Politicians are voted in by the people then they make decisions for us without even considering our opinons ,I think there should be a committee of ordinary people to pass the changes etc, by..... Politicians keep moving the goal posts after we have worked hard to save, no wonder the up and coming generation don't save as we did, they can see it is fruitless to do this, and the economies are being stuffed up mainly by squandering of the country's money by them. 

Pauline
Pauline from QLD commented:

With the changes due to come in from 1/1/17, I am due to have around $6,000 reduction in my part pension after working continuously from the age of 17 - 65. I paid my taxes and saved towards having a comfortable retirement. I am now a widow living on my own and will find it hard enough to manage with $6,000 pa less, let alone if the Government starts taxing my allocated pension or takes my house into account. That will blow me out of the water altogether and mean that I would be in a bad financial situation which will cause me stress and probably health problems as I grow older. That wasn't the sort of retirement I was envisaging when I did without luxuries in order to save for for my retirement for all those years. Come on, why is there such a "them and us" culture in this country. It's just not on and something needs to be done about it - like making sure the big multi-nationals pay their fair share of tax and if you must tax super - just tax those will millions in their balance and houses over say $2 million, not us poor ordinary hard working people whose dream of a wonderful retirement will go out the window if David Murray's suggestions are implemented. However, I can also envisage if Labor gets in, we will be ruled by the Unions and the country will decline even further and faster!! 

margaret
margaret from NSW replied to Pauline:

The well of, such as our pollies have little idea what a home means to many Australians. Because the well off often consider a house is a house not a home they think of it as a status symbol, an investment, something in which they have little emotional involvement, something that can be disposed of when it suits them, just like an employee or an aging marriage partner. Because there is so much in their lives, so many experiences and memories, numerous trips overseas fine restaurants theaters and concerts, and often the feeling of power and achievement, the house/home is simply a part of much. This makes it difficult to understand that less well off homeowners and some renters have gone without most those pleasurable experiences to pay for the roof over their head. This means their memories revolve around the home, the challenge of saving to furnish it and the feeling of achievement when the ,sofa arrives, the a children growing up, parties, BBQs a place you came to and felt safe in after another mindless work day, a place your children and grandchildren can return to if their world falls apart. This HOME means more to these people than the well off could ever understand, and to for the better off to wish that these people should lose it in their old age is cruel The other factor concerning the family home in the future, is that with the ever escalating cost of a home and the need for so many to attend university the period of saving for a deposit can go on into ones thirties. By the time it is payed off and the children have left home so there is spare money to enjoy a few more of life's goodies, it can be close to the time you will be taxed out of all you have worked for by those who have made sure there will always be a very good roof over their own head. A very good roof over their head due to the high wages they received, paid from the taxes of those who could now be forced out of their own home. 

Warren
Warren from NSW replied to Pauline:

Seems to me you've identified no future options, just more doom and gloom. David Murray's report and numerous other committees of reviews like Ken Henry are totally ignored as the implementation of any suggestions will divide society. One person's gain is another's pain - quite unpalatable for our Politicians to do anything without some fringe extremist group screaming all the way to the next election. 

Comment Guidelines