News

NewsThe 3 Biggest Mistakes People Make Saving For Retirement
The 3 Biggest Mistakes People Make Saving For Retirement

The 3 Biggest Mistakes People Make Saving For Retirement

Gary Stone is the author of Blueprint to Wealth: Financial Freedom in 15 Minutes a Week and this week we spoke to Gary on the FiftyUp Club Radio show about the Top 3 Mistakes People Make When Saving For Retirement.

Gary says “saving for retirement is a multi-decade investing venture, even for those approaching retirement. Indeed, actuaries in 2015 stated that there is a 70% chance that one of a 65-year-old couple will reach 90 years old, meaning that even retirement is a multi-decade investing proposition.”

Many in the Fifty Up Club will have children who are still in the early stages of accumulating their retirement nest egg. Bear them in mind when reading this article. According to Gary's book, here are the Top 3 Mistakes People Make....

Mistake 1 – investing in diversified balanced funds over the long term

When starting a new job, employees need to choose where their monthly Superannuation contributions will be invested by their new employer. New employees are typically faced with a confusing list of managed funds from which to select. These new employees of all age groups typically tick a box on a form having spent less time thinking about where to invest their retirement contributions than they would spend choosing a meal off an à la carte menu.

Deciding where and how to invest their retirement savings is the biggest financial decision that individuals will make in the sense that the wrong choice can cost everyday people more in lost savings than any other financial decisions they will ever make.

It is just far too important not to put more effort into their retirement investing decision.

The typical outcome of this poor decision is that 70% to 75% of retirement savers will defer to the social default which is choosing a more cautious balanced or diversified fund of some sort in an industry or retail Super fund. This is a big mistake. Because over-caution equals under-performance over the long term. The younger the new employee the bigger this mistake. Over the long term this mistake will cost the retirement saver multiple hundreds of thousands of dollars in forfeited retirement savings compared to electing to invest their retirement savings in a mainstream stock market index Exchange Traded Fund (ETF).

Mistake 2 – Falling for the fee-loving financial establishment

Workers allow themselves to be fee-fleeced by active fund managers such as industry Super Funds. Fees contribute to the 2.6% p.a. difference referred to in Mistake 1. Industry Super funds’ annual fees are in the order of double to seven times higher than index Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs).

As John Bogle, the founder of Vanguard, so aptly put it, “… the magic of compound returns is overwhelmed by the tyranny of compound costs.”

In the case of People vs fee-loving financial establishment, the people are losing hands down.

Mistake 3 – Succumbing to ongoing hide & seek fees

Mistake number three is paying financial planners and advisers ongoing annual fees as a percentage of funds under management. Adviser fees can range from 0.5% p.a. to 2% p.a. of a client’s funds being managed by the adviser. These fees are in addition to management fees charged by the managed funds in which advisers may invest their clients’ money.

A fee that is calculated as a percentage of a client’s wealth continues to scale higher in absolute terms as the client’s wealth rises in value.

Adviser fees or most of managed Super fund fees¸ potentially costing hundreds of thousands of dollars in forfeited growth over multiple decades, can almost be completely avoided by individuals gaining their own knowledge about index investing themselves using ETFs. Give fees the flick, start your own fee avoidance movement.

Any information contained in this article is of a general nature only, that is it does not take into account your own particular circumstances and needs, either now or in the future. If in doubt about your personal situation or needs you should seek financial advice.

Click through to Gary's website here

Originally posted on .

Join the conversation

FiftyUp Club
The 3 Biggest Mistakes People Make Saving for Retirement

Share your views with other members. 

Want to leave a comment? or .
Read our moderation policy here.
john
john from QLD commented:

Re 'fee-fleeced by active fund managers such as industry Super Funds". that is actually incorrect as the industry Super Funds have the best record for performance, fees and growth etc 

Gary
Gary from VIC replied to john:

John, You are correct, the industry Super do perform better compared to other Super funds. Indeed, industry Super funds fill most of the top 10 spots most of the time when the performance ratings are published. But there is another type of fund that Super investors can invest in, called an ETF (see Reply to Clair below) that can perform way better over the long term than the Balanced Super funds where 75% of Super investors, according to Ian Silk, CEO of AustralianSuper, invest their Super contributions. From July 1993 the median Super fund return was 7.25% compounded annual return (CAR). Over the same period the ASX20 Accumulation index achieved 9.85% (CAR). This excludes franking credits which would add another at least 0.35% CAR depending on the individuals tax situation. The ETF code on the ASX for the ASX20 index is ILC. Anybody can invest in this ETF. Even most industry Super funds allow their members to invest in ETFs (and stocks) now. That piddly 2,6% CAR over the long term = 100s of 1000s of $ more for one's Super fund lump sum. There is limited space here to demonstrate the very high probability of outperformance by index ETFs over active Balanced funds, which is why I spent 3 years researching this in detail and writing a book! 

Claire
Claire from NSW commented:

I understand that Industry Super Funds take LOWER fees than managed funds!!!! I query your comments regarding - "fee-fleeced by active fund managers such as industry Super Funds." Please explain.....?????? Claire Burnett 

Gary
Gary from VIC replied to Claire:

Clair, Industry Super funds do charge lower fees than retail Super funds and other managed funds. However, there are alternative funds in which anybody can invest that charge way lower fees and over the long term perform far better than nearly every managed fund, Super or otherwise. They are called Exchange Traded Funds, or ETFs. Those that I will discuss are specifically index ETFs which are listed on the stock market and they track stock market indices. There are other kinds but that's for another time. In Australia, ETF annual management fees range from 0.05% p.a. to 0.29% p.a. for the mainstream indices such as the ASX20, ASX50, ASX200 & ASX300, regardless of how much one invests. Industry Super Funds' annual fees range from around 0.7% p.a.to around 1.1% p.a. for average account balances. I say 'around' because they charge a min admin fee regardless of size of account balance which could push the %age fee much higher for low account balances, such as our youth, where the annual fees can be 3% and higher, as much as 10% in their first years of working. Let's get specific, say there are 200,000 of our youth in their first years of work with Super account balances of around $1,500 all getting charged admin fees of around $45 -$75 p.a. (this is not auto opt-in insurance premiums which is another discussion). This doesn't sound like a lot but as a % it 3% - 5% p.a.. Now pool that money and suddenly you have $300 million dollars attracting fees in this range. This is fee-fleecing. This is just one example. I'll provide more. 

Comment Guidelines