News

News40 years after Gough, are we better off?
40 years after Gough, are we better off?

40 years after Gough, are we better off?

gough-whitlamDear Fellow Members,

The death of Gough Whitlam this week (may he rest in peace), had all of us thinking of different times.

Like many FiftyUps, you may have found yourself rewinding 40 years and reminiscing about how different it was to live in Australia in the mid-1970s.

At the FiftyUp Club, conversation turned to whether we were better off.

In 1974 we were paying 30 cents for a litre of milk.

We were outraged when Federal Treasurer Frank Crean upped the price of a postage stamp from 10 cents to 18 cents.

A loaf of white bread cost 24 cents, and a kilo of rump steak was $3.24.

And petrol was less than 20c/Litre before the 1970s oil shock.

Ah, the good old days, when the average male income was about $150 per week, the age pension was $26 per person and so was the dole.

The average house price in the capital cities was just under $30,000.

Are we better off since the days of Gough as PM?

Today we pay $1.50 on average for a litre of milk – that’s 5 times the 1974 price (and no doubt it’s being kept low by the big supermarket discount wars on milk).

An average loaf of bread is $2.93, which is more than 12 times the 1974 price, despite the supermarket wars.

We hardly use stamps anymore, but they’re 70c – that’s almost four times the 1974 price. But email is much cheaper, fortunately.

Petrol is 8 times the price at an average of $1.50.

The average price of a home in 2014 is about $550,000 – which is 18 times what it was back then!

Overall, the Consumer Price Index calculated by the Australia Bureau of Statistics has risen from 14.7 in 1974 to 105.9 today, which is a little over 7-fold.

But Australians’ average weekly earnings are about $1500, which is 10 times what it was in 1974. The aged pension is now a bit over $400 or about 15 times the 1974 rate.

So theoretically, we should feel better off. Some boffins like this one argue we just spend more and expect more these days. But is it as simple as that? We think not.

We paid upfront for healthcare before Medicare (or Medibank, as it was first called), but we weren’t paying an average private health insurance bill per couple of over $3000 in 1974.

There was no such thing as a broadband bill back then, or a $2000-per-household power bill – as some of us now pay.

Gough was a political locomotive in a hurry to reform Australia by crashing through or crashing. Fortunately there are many positive legacies, and they were affectionately acknowledged by all sides after news of his passing age 98.

As Tony Abbott said yesterday: “Whether you were for him or against him, it was his vision that drove our politics then and which still echoes through our public life four decades on.”

But governments since the 1970s are kidding themselves if they think they’ve done their job by making us all better off since Gough.

As FiftyUps we can be grateful for Medicare, free Education, Women’s Rights and the Rights of our Aborigines.

But we should keep campaigning for governments around Australia to keep one eye on what it costs to live in this wonderful country of ours.

Originally posted on .

Join the conversation

FiftyUp Club
40 years after Gough, are we better off?

Share your views with other members. 

Want to leave a comment? or .
Read our moderation policy here.
Penny
Penny from NSW commented:

I feel if one can't say something nice about someone then it's better not to say anything at all. Penny from Padstow 

Someone
Someone from NSW commented:

Are you kidding? I still remember the double digit interest rates and double digit inflation - It is all very well to have "VISION"!!!!! just as long as you can afford it. It's the usual thing between Labor philosophy and Liberal philosophy i.e. REALITY!!! In Gough's case his lack of reality was on steroids!! He might be gone, but we're stuck with his mistakes!! 

Thomas and Claire
Thomas and Claire from NSW commented:

Any mistakes from that era in the 1970s (and there were indeed mistakes) are in the long term but a mere blip on the screen. What had a truly profound and enduring effect on this country and all our lives are the social and political changes enacted at that time - things like the introduction of Medicare, recognition of Aboriginal rights, the concept of a high level of education being accessible to the poor as well as the rich, Australia's political recognition of China, and the introduction of equal pay for equal work, to name but a few. The higher interest rates and higher inflation of that time were largely a reflection of world-wide upheavals and economic shift. 

Ivanka
Ivanka from NSW commented:

I would lave to by house those days with double digit interest rate for $ 30.000.00 then single digits for $ 550.000.00 average for Australia and $850.000.00 in Sydney today. You are stuck with Liberal philosophy that just rich people deserve to have house, go to university, drive the car if they have, buy the god cut of meat and so on. Dissent life is for all of us not only for privileged people. Poor people are paying more tax then rich and it is wrong philosophy stuck with a lot of us, unfortunately. 

Deborah
Deborah from NSW commented:

I will state I did agree with Sir John Kerr' re: Gough Whitlam who was an incredible formidable achieving Politician and person . I'll never forget the day/night Medicare came into Australia, Sydney and working in a private pathology laboratory over 180+ plus unnecessary Executive Profiles were carried out on people in nursing homes and night staff had to be called in to cope with the deluge of specimens that I have never seen in my life! And laboratories since then have never seen the same deluge in any week. As you say are we better off or let us think and reflect ? Thank you 

Keith
Keith from QLD commented:

Yes Roslyn, however that is when things started to go Downhill. The 50's were much better and we had a lot more Industry, Farming and of course Employment. I remember getting a bag of lollies for tuppence. Our Society was also far more stable and Safer of course. I personally think that all of our work and savings has now gone overseas. In my opinion the solid foundation that we built for Australia with our labour and devotion has now been destroyed. I remember when Gough was in power and I was in the Services, we went 2 weeks without any pay from the Government? So Politicians, I do not trust at all. 

Robert
Robert from VIC commented:

When my parents migrated from England in 1950 with myself being a young boy of 5, I was automatically given Australian citizenship. Gough Whitlam took this away and said we had to now apply for citizenship. Even today I vote, pay taxes, and have sat on a jury but still cannot get an Australian passport. I never forgave him for this. Perhaps now he's gone I will apply for citizenship at age 70. Rip Gough... 

Roslyn
Roslyn from QLD commented:

Gough Whitlam was a man ahead of his time, may he rest in peace. I had my first child in the 1970's. Back then you could afford to be in a Private Health Fund as long as your husband was working. Back then you actually got money back from your health fund, there were no gaps, you actually ended up with cash in your hand. Medibank as it was known was a great back up for pensioners and people in hardship. Hospital waiting list weren't as long. Then one day the Government got into bed with the Private Health Funds and it all went to hell. Every year our fees increase yet we get nothing extra back. When the last increase came in I checked around for a better deal, when I asked about a Pension Discount, I was informed that the Government wouldn't allow them to provide discounts to anyone. Our first home cost $4250.00 for a 1/4 acre block and the house cost $21,000 to build. You could afford to live on one wage and my husband was a boiler maker and was certainly under what we like to classify as the average wage. Speaking of the average income. How do they come up with these figures? My husband who is 63 was working a 50 hour week for a gross weekly wage of $1,000.00. I could go on with more examples but I think I have made my point. Yes we were definitely better off in the 70's. 

Thomas and Claire
Thomas and Claire from NSW commented:

I feel that's an important point in the story above, that modern life means expenditure on items that didn't even exist in the 1970s; things like a computer and an internet connection, and mobile phones. What I particularly note as a difference between life in the 1970s and now, is the amount of incoming information that needs to to be dealt with, analysed and processed, and subsequently the number of decisions that need to be made in daily life today compared to the 1970s. Life truly seemed so much simpler then. 

John
John from NSW commented:

Helen..'The Man of Vision' did not have the vision to see that socialism is good until you run out of everybody else's money and have to try to borrow from shadowy middle eastern characters. You are another one gilding the lilly, lets just pay him the respect of a former PM not attempt to change History. Heaven knows what heroes Gillard and Rudd will become in your world of fantasy. 

Ivanka
Ivanka from NSW replied to John:

socialism is when all people have normal life not only right oriented who think that only they should live and have slaves in 21 sentry. 

Denise
Denise from NSW replied to Ivanka:

Socialism is when everyone is a slave to the government 

Belinda
Belinda from QLD replied to Ivanka:

Socialism? Show me one Socialist country with a good general standard of living. It is a failed concept where the people slave away for a pittance and the members of the Govt. get wealthy. 

Heather
Heather from QLD replied to Belinda:

Oh, you're talking about 'socialism' are you? Silly me! When I read the words "........people slave ..................members of govt. get wealthy.", I thought you must have been talking about NOW. 

Belinda
Belinda from QLD replied to Heather:

No Heather, WE have the chance to prosper just as much as the politicians, it's just that most people CHOOSE not to. Either they don't want to work the long hours (how often do politicians get the weekend off I wonder, or have a relaxing dinner at home with the family?) or perhaps most people don't want to take a risk. Then again, we could all become politicians IF we wanted to, but most, like me, choose not to. If they do so well, why don't you give it a go? Oh, ok..... In Socialism you can work all you want to, but it doesn't get you anywhere, mind you China is changing that somewhat. 

John
John from NSW replied to Ivanka:

Ivanka, why don't you move to one of the few remaining socialists countries that remain, like China or Vietnam, perhaps you could convince East Germany to return to socialism! You are a very poor student of History. If you can't learn lessons from the past, you will learn nothing. Socialism is a corrupt ideology, making powerful people extremely rich and the poor no better off. China is a perfect example of corruption gone rampant with the poor peasant farmer still living in abject poverty whilst those that 'govern live like kings! Normal life in China, Vietnam, Russia for the poor - not likely ever. 

Anna
Anna from NSW replied to John:

John How sucinct! A 

Denise
Denise from NSW commented:

Cost of government as a percentage of GDP rose from 18% to over 24% during the Whitlam administration and has never recovered. That is a huge increase. Education and health are NOT free. There are still school fees, HECS, textbooks, etc and fewer jobs for students due to restrictions on minimum working hours (shifts) and increases in minimum/youth wages and the imposition of penalty rates. Many people already pay for a visit to the doctor over and above the medicare rebate. Slashing big government would allow for more of the tax payer dollar to be used in these area as well as law and order, emergency services, etc. 

Helen
Helen from VIC commented:

Vale Gough. What a giant among men, literally and figuratively. A man of vision whose legacy has made this country what it is today. Politicians now are petty, small minded and venal. We need to find another man of his ilk. 

Comment Guidelines