News

News40 years after Gough, are we better off?
40 years after Gough, are we better off?

40 years after Gough, are we better off?

gough-whitlamDear Fellow Members,

The death of Gough Whitlam this week (may he rest in peace), had all of us thinking of different times.

Like many FiftyUps, you may have found yourself rewinding 40 years and reminiscing about how different it was to live in Australia in the mid-1970s.

At the FiftyUp Club, conversation turned to whether we were better off.

In 1974 we were paying 30 cents for a litre of milk.

We were outraged when Federal Treasurer Frank Crean upped the price of a postage stamp from 10 cents to 18 cents.

A loaf of white bread cost 24 cents, and a kilo of rump steak was $3.24.

And petrol was less than 20c/Litre before the 1970s oil shock.

Ah, the good old days, when the average male income was about $150 per week, the age pension was $26 per person and so was the dole.

The average house price in the capital cities was just under $30,000.

Are we better off since the days of Gough as PM?

Today we pay $1.50 on average for a litre of milk – that’s 5 times the 1974 price (and no doubt it’s being kept low by the big supermarket discount wars on milk).

An average loaf of bread is $2.93, which is more than 12 times the 1974 price, despite the supermarket wars.

We hardly use stamps anymore, but they’re 70c – that’s almost four times the 1974 price. But email is much cheaper, fortunately.

Petrol is 8 times the price at an average of $1.50.

The average price of a home in 2014 is about $550,000 – which is 18 times what it was back then!

Overall, the Consumer Price Index calculated by the Australia Bureau of Statistics has risen from 14.7 in 1974 to 105.9 today, which is a little over 7-fold.

But Australians’ average weekly earnings are about $1500, which is 10 times what it was in 1974. The aged pension is now a bit over $400 or about 15 times the 1974 rate.

So theoretically, we should feel better off. Some boffins like this one argue we just spend more and expect more these days. But is it as simple as that? We think not.

We paid upfront for healthcare before Medicare (or Medibank, as it was first called), but we weren’t paying an average private health insurance bill per couple of over $3000 in 1974.

There was no such thing as a broadband bill back then, or a $2000-per-household power bill – as some of us now pay.

Gough was a political locomotive in a hurry to reform Australia by crashing through or crashing. Fortunately there are many positive legacies, and they were affectionately acknowledged by all sides after news of his passing age 98.

As Tony Abbott said yesterday: “Whether you were for him or against him, it was his vision that drove our politics then and which still echoes through our public life four decades on.”

But governments since the 1970s are kidding themselves if they think they’ve done their job by making us all better off since Gough.

As FiftyUps we can be grateful for Medicare, free Education, Women’s Rights and the Rights of our Aborigines.

But we should keep campaigning for governments around Australia to keep one eye on what it costs to live in this wonderful country of ours.

Originally posted on .

Join the conversation

FiftyUp Club
40 years after Gough, are we better off?

Share your views with other members. 

Want to leave a comment? or .
Read our moderation policy here.
Someone
Someone from NSW commented:

I think a lot has been said of Gough Whitlam over the last couple of days and he achieved one thing for our family and that was the whole family stopped voting Labor after 1971. We came from Lithgow and my grandfather was a coal miner and member of the Labor Party under John Curtin and Ben Chifley. These 2 gentleman were Australia's best Prime Ministers. Graham Lees 

Rob
Rob from VIC commented:

If my memory serves me correctly he got in on the basis of stopping conscription, and getting our people out of Vietnam and those out of goal who would not do national service. The people of Australia loved him for 5 minutes until he brought in all the things our country could not afford and then tried to secretly borrow from the middle east... He was better than Gillard and Rudd but only because he had a sense on humour....... 

Barbara
Barbara from NSW commented:

We definitely are, he ruined Australia and put us all in debt, certainly not the champion he is being depicted, being credited for things others did, shameful. 

Dave
Dave from NSW commented:

Have lost faith in politicians of all creeds. The worst for me as a top level tradesman with high productivity was Howard. He took the bread out of my family's mouths. Seems to me that non-productive accountants have taken over. 

Al
Al from NSW commented:

Gough Whitlam’s death once again has the ABC playing the Whitlam Myth, but it made me reflect on his real legacy, and how much it has been lessened by the last Labor Government: If only Whitlam had died at 92 instead of 98, he would have got the send-off he deserved, unchallenged as the worst Prime Minister in Australian history, a warning to all that Fabian socialists will wreck the economy if given half a chance. Tragically for Gough's place in History, he was surpassed in his twilight years by two Prime Ministers who not only emulated his irresponsible “Tax, Borrow and Spend” style of government, they surpassed it! First Kevin 07's Stalinist cult of the personality swept him to a power he craved but fatally misused, propelling him in less than three years to number one spot ahead of Whitlam. Gough must have been gutted to see many of his most foolish policies parodied and then trumped by the Rudd caricature of a government. He had hardly adjusted to being only the second-worst Prime Minister in Australian history when Rudd was treacherously knifed by another Fabian fanatic Julia Gillard, who went on to win the next election as "the real Julia", then proceeded to trash our Country even more than Rudd had done, with the Carbon Tax she promised not to deliver, the mining tax that earned nothing, and the Whitlam-style handouts to all the rent-seekers that she thought might vote Labor. She was so bad that the Governor General didn't need to sack her: her own party did. Gough watched in horror as he was reduced to a footnote as only the 3rd-worst PM in Australia's history. Tragic. Who could have picked that his title could be stolen so quickly? At least he can take some solace from the fact that he was the first wrecking ball to smash into the Australian economy, and the original architect of our entitlement culture, but how sad that he lost his first place to these two. Could they not have been just a little more competent and left Gough his place in the sun? 

Anna
Anna from NSW replied to Al:

Al, I agree with you wholeheartedly... Go figure: Socialists...Communists et al Why didn't they, and their comrades, go to.... say, North Korea, for a while.....maybe 12 months, without return rights, for that time, if Communism/Socialism is the way to go. I reckon there would have been a we bit of 'push & shove' to return to OZ asap...after, say again...uummm 2 days!! 

John
John from NSW commented:

Ivanka, if socialism is so good what are you doing in a great democratic country like Australia, why don't you go and live in one of the few surviving socialist countries in the world like China or Vietnam or ask East Germany if they want to go back to being socialist. Ivanka 'LOVE AUSTRALIA OR FOFF.' Ask the peasant farmers in China if they are having a normal life!! You're a poor student of history. 

Cheryl
Cheryl from NSW commented:

It takes a 50up to put the whole thing in perspective John. Thanks. On the whole I think we are better off but and it's a big BUT, we have to keep reminding the pollies they work FOR us - not the other way round, although it seems like it some times, lol. 

Lionel
Lionel from NSW commented:

We are certainly NOT better off financially now than 40 years ago. However, our moral and ethical standards are also a long way shoet of what they were. The Country has gone backwards. 

Len
Len from NSW commented:

It appears that many emotions are being stirred up by this one. How about a simple poll? 

Kristine
Kristine from NSW commented:

He tried, and he failed. Labor keeps trying and keeps failing.....and people still vote them back in to keep failing. I don't understand it and never have. Australia was much better off in the 60's and 70's, without all the handouts and "Nanny" regulations, but the whole world is changing, and Australia will always follow, for good or bad. We struggled to pay our mortgage in the 70's and 80's, but thankfully we didn't have the level of debt the young have today. We also didn't have the lifestyle that needs so much money to feed it as they do today. We were probably better off because we had more limits on our spending, and not as much to spend the money on anyway. (Anon - Sydney) 

Comment Guidelines