News

NewsWhat the Budget means for FiftyUps
What the Budget means for FiftyUps

What the Budget means for FiftyUps

What the Budget means for FiftyUps

Everyone else is giving their verdict on the Budget today, so it’s important us older Australians get a word in edgeways – especially since issues around retirement planning have been, and will remain, a key battleground.

We’ve created a succinct survey on Joe Hockey’s plans for you to rate their fairness, impact, ability to change your vote and to meet our long-term challenges.

Please click here to rate the Budget

So… what was there in it for you? It largely depends on your age, income and assets but there are key changes to pension eligibility and incentives to keep older Aussies in w

ork.

Much of this we knew before Tuesday night, due to planned ‘leaks’, but now the political horse-trading begins meaning it’s even more important to know where your interests lie.

Cost of Living

The Treasurer seemed to take credit for the cost of living falling, due to somewhat cheaper electricity post the carbon tax and lower mortgage rates thanks to the Reserve Bank. He also told the ABC “petrol is cheaper than it has been”.

I’m sure a few self-funded retirees, suffering from still-very high energy and petrol bills and hit by ever lower interest rates on bank deposits, might beg to differ.

Pensions.

Joe Hockey sought to inspire some confidence on retirement incomes.

“I want to reassure all Australian workers that they can have confidence in their retirement plans under this government. There will be no new taxes on superannuation under this government, and their age pension will continue to increase twice a year this year and every year at the highest available index rate,” he said last night.

 “These measures are all intended to provide security and and certainty for older australians in the years ahead.”

The key ‘benefit’ to all pensioners is the dropping of plans to reduce the rate at which they were indexed. It never happened but generated plenty of fear and anger.

Despite fears of cuts to the Pensioner Concession Card, which delivers much-appreciated discounts on public transport, utilities, medicines and GPs, it has also been quarantined from changes.

So those who might lose access to the pension with the new assets test and still have the card will keep it.

But the real meat of the changes for older Australians involved tightening the pensions assets test, to keep the pension – more than 10% of government spending – sustainable and affordable.

The new thresholds to the pension-asset test and changes to the taper rate will see 50,000 more of us get the full pension. In addition, 122,000 part-pensioners will get another $30 a fortnight.

But the $44 billion annual bill for the Age Pension bill has been cut by $2.4 billion and there are some losers who, while they may be portrayed as relatively well-off, will have complaints.

By the government’s own figures they include 91,000 who will lose the pension altogether and 235,000 who will find their pension reduced.

The changes have been largely greeted by seniors’ group but analysts have pointed out it brings uncertainty into the incentives to save for your retirement. Under the changes some people who’ve saved more will end up worse off than those who’ve saved less.

In simple terms, as outlined by Andrew Main in Tuesday’s The Australian a home-owning couple, with assets outside the house worth less than $600,000, get a higher income than an otherwise similar couple with assets worth between $650,000- $1.1million.

He says the changes to the taper rate would leave a couple with $800,000 of assets about $12,000 a year worse off.

The argument around who gets what in the pension will continue, and that means over-50s will continue to feel insecure.

Work

The incentives for employers to engage older workers are to be overhauled with faster access to a $10,000 subsidy for hiring new workers aged over 50.

The program called Restart is meant to make it easier for older workers to get jobs. The Treasurer said the changes were designed to make the subsidies more available when and where they were needed.

You have to wonder whether the scheme is not working, given it’s only a year old.

There will also be a scheme to offer better training for older workers to find work instead of relying on benefits, which the FiftyUp Club has been calling for over a year. Read more about Seniors concerned about job competition here

HAVE YOUR SAY: 

Was the Budget fair on FiftyUps? How will it affect you? Is it the right Budget for Australia in 2015?

Take our 2-minute Post-Budget Snap Poll and rate the Government's fiscal efforts HERE

Originally posted on .

Join the conversation

FiftyUp Club
What the Budget means for FiftyUps

Share your views with other members. 

Want to leave a comment? or .
Read our moderation policy here.
Barbara
Barbara from NSW commented:

What a horrible government taking money off pensioners they forget women were not entitled to a pension until the 80's. It is a mans world we have to get rid of this selfish government who will be on a good wicket for the rest of their lives. How would they know how we live and how much we have to give up in our personal lives to survive. DISGUTING 

Karen
Karen from NSW replied to Barbara:

Barbara, I think you have misunderstood. If you have nothing or very little, you will actually gain about $30 a week on the pension when these changes come into being in 2017. You would lose nothing. The people who will be most affected are those singles with more than $550,000 (down from $750,000) and couples with more than $823,000 (down from $1.1m) in assets excluding their home. These are the middle income people who will be worse off then a person on the full pension if current low interest rates persist. They cannot generate the same level of income as the pension and so will have to draw on the capital to make up the difference. They will therefore reduce their assets quicker and eventually have to reply on the pension faster than otherwise planned. Given all experts have said you need in the region of $1m in super to have a modest retirement, this reduction seems unfair as it puts the income generated below that of the full pension with none of the associated benefits a person on the aged pension. 

ian
ian from NSW commented:

I am still none the wiser about the figures. between my wife and me we have $667,000. after a lifetime of work. can someone tell me where we stand as to what we lose or would we be better off just spending it, and when does this taper kick in. while the amount sounds a lot it is nearly all tied up in super which can fluctuate on a daily basis quite a lot ...Ian nsw 

Karen
Karen from NSW replied to ian:

My understanding is that you will continue to receive a part pension and the health card if you have it now. 

ian
ian from NSW replied to Karen:

thank's Karen I will stock up on baked beans 

Karen
Karen from NSW replied to ian:

Better make that home-brand beans :-( 

Colin
Colin from VIC replied to ian:

I hope this may help. The only way I have been able to calculate for ourselves in a very similar situation is by working back from the cut-off figures. By my calcs, you would each be currently receiving $363 per fortnight, and this would reduce to $234 under the proposed changes ie you would lose $6,700.00 per year. 

Kevin
Kevin from QLD commented:

From what I know of the Budget at this moment, while there is as always winners and losers, it seems reasonable propositions have been advanced. As a retiree, I think changes to pension eligibility are quite fair. The problem is,as a nation we all want our wants addressed rather than our needs. A chap suggested on radio yesterday (May 12) a retiree with $1m and receiving $60,000 income from that and (his words) about $1000 in government health entitlements was worse off than a salary/wage-earner on $185,000 and entitled to $10,000 of government child care entitlements. Seems to me both are okay financially and it is questionable either need government assistance. Back to the Budget, we all need to expect a little less so Australia can grow and meet its future needs. I do however like to cuts to foreign aid. As a nation, look after ourselves first and when all is rosy be prepared to look after others. And I hope that doesn't come over as "me me me". 

Someone
Someone from VIC commented:

Is the Restart scheme only for those on unemployment benefits, or is it for all over 50 job seekers? I'm frustrated that being a 50 plus woman looking for work, I am not a recognised statistic, or recognised by the system in any way, if my husband is in full-time work. I have been in the worforce for most of my life, and after a short break, am wanting to re-enter the workforce, but with no government assistance. 50 plus women are sorely overlooked! 

Karen
Karen from NSW commented:

All over 50s workers are overlooked not just women. And yes the incentive to employ you would apply BUT the money does not go to you it goes to the employer and I doubt that $10,000 is much of an incentive. 

Dale
Dale from NSW commented:

Nothing for self funded retirees 

Keith
Keith from QLD commented:

Nothing much for self funded retirees. 

Dale
Dale from NSW commented:

Nothing for self funded retirees 

Dell
Dell from QLD commented:

The problem is there isn't the jobs available , for older Ozzies or sometimes younger ones & employers would probably consider younger people less of a health risk , although oldies R generally more reliable . Many would like to work if they could get a job. 

Comment Guidelines