News

NewsWhat the Budget means for FiftyUps
What the Budget means for FiftyUps

What the Budget means for FiftyUps

What the Budget means for FiftyUps

Everyone else is giving their verdict on the Budget today, so it’s important us older Australians get a word in edgeways – especially since issues around retirement planning have been, and will remain, a key battleground.

We’ve created a succinct survey on Joe Hockey’s plans for you to rate their fairness, impact, ability to change your vote and to meet our long-term challenges.

Please click here to rate the Budget

So… what was there in it for you? It largely depends on your age, income and assets but there are key changes to pension eligibility and incentives to keep older Aussies in w

ork.

Much of this we knew before Tuesday night, due to planned ‘leaks’, but now the political horse-trading begins meaning it’s even more important to know where your interests lie.

Cost of Living

The Treasurer seemed to take credit for the cost of living falling, due to somewhat cheaper electricity post the carbon tax and lower mortgage rates thanks to the Reserve Bank. He also told the ABC “petrol is cheaper than it has been”.

I’m sure a few self-funded retirees, suffering from still-very high energy and petrol bills and hit by ever lower interest rates on bank deposits, might beg to differ.

Pensions.

Joe Hockey sought to inspire some confidence on retirement incomes.

“I want to reassure all Australian workers that they can have confidence in their retirement plans under this government. There will be no new taxes on superannuation under this government, and their age pension will continue to increase twice a year this year and every year at the highest available index rate,” he said last night.

 “These measures are all intended to provide security and and certainty for older australians in the years ahead.”

The key ‘benefit’ to all pensioners is the dropping of plans to reduce the rate at which they were indexed. It never happened but generated plenty of fear and anger.

Despite fears of cuts to the Pensioner Concession Card, which delivers much-appreciated discounts on public transport, utilities, medicines and GPs, it has also been quarantined from changes.

So those who might lose access to the pension with the new assets test and still have the card will keep it.

But the real meat of the changes for older Australians involved tightening the pensions assets test, to keep the pension – more than 10% of government spending – sustainable and affordable.

The new thresholds to the pension-asset test and changes to the taper rate will see 50,000 more of us get the full pension. In addition, 122,000 part-pensioners will get another $30 a fortnight.

But the $44 billion annual bill for the Age Pension bill has been cut by $2.4 billion and there are some losers who, while they may be portrayed as relatively well-off, will have complaints.

By the government’s own figures they include 91,000 who will lose the pension altogether and 235,000 who will find their pension reduced.

The changes have been largely greeted by seniors’ group but analysts have pointed out it brings uncertainty into the incentives to save for your retirement. Under the changes some people who’ve saved more will end up worse off than those who’ve saved less.

In simple terms, as outlined by Andrew Main in Tuesday’s The Australian a home-owning couple, with assets outside the house worth less than $600,000, get a higher income than an otherwise similar couple with assets worth between $650,000- $1.1million.

He says the changes to the taper rate would leave a couple with $800,000 of assets about $12,000 a year worse off.

The argument around who gets what in the pension will continue, and that means over-50s will continue to feel insecure.

Work

The incentives for employers to engage older workers are to be overhauled with faster access to a $10,000 subsidy for hiring new workers aged over 50.

The program called Restart is meant to make it easier for older workers to get jobs. The Treasurer said the changes were designed to make the subsidies more available when and where they were needed.

You have to wonder whether the scheme is not working, given it’s only a year old.

There will also be a scheme to offer better training for older workers to find work instead of relying on benefits, which the FiftyUp Club has been calling for over a year. Read more about Seniors concerned about job competition here

HAVE YOUR SAY: 

Was the Budget fair on FiftyUps? How will it affect you? Is it the right Budget for Australia in 2015?

Take our 2-minute Post-Budget Snap Poll and rate the Government's fiscal efforts HERE

Originally posted on .

Join the conversation

FiftyUp Club
What the Budget means for FiftyUps

Share your views with other members. 

Want to leave a comment? or .
Read our moderation policy here.
Geoff
Geoff from VIC commented:

As a single pensioner, my wife is yet to reach pension age, and as a modest home owner, <$500K, with a modest amount of superannuation, it is my understanding I will loose all my part pension. There will continue to be gross inequity until the value of pensioner's homes are included in the Assets test. Geoff from Victoria 

Alain
Alain from NSW replied to Geoff:

So, is it 'cause you have more than $832000 in savings, Geoff, can I please ask you? 

Alain
Alain from NSW replied to Alain:

*$823000 

Karen
Karen from NSW replied to Geoff:

Geoff your home is NOT included in the assets test now or in 2017 when the new 'rules' will apply. As a couple you can have up to $823,000 in other assets (e.g. super, cash in the bank, boat, artwork, gold bars, cash in a sock under the bed..... ) before you would lose your part pension completely. If you have a health care card you will retain that too. You need proper advice as your wife is working still, but on the surface it sounds like you will come out ok. 

Geoff
Geoff from VIC replied to Karen:

Karen, You totally misunderstood my comment. Of course I am aware ones home is not included in the Asset test now, or anytime soon. I was trying to illustrate the inequity of the home values not being included As a single pensioner you are subject to the single assets and income tests limits even though the assets of one's wife are also included. 

Karen
Karen from NSW replied to Geoff:

Part of the 'joy' of being married. What's mine is yours, what's yours is mine! And what you both have is the business of Centrelink! ;-) And wouldn't you be worse off if the home was part of the assets test? Under the new rules it may push you off the pension altogether. 

Geoff
Geoff from VIC replied to Karen:

Should the value of homes ever be included, naturally there would be a major re alignment of limits. I would envisage homes below a set figure of say, $800K, would continue to be exempt. 

ian
ian from NSW commented:

I agree with kevin from QLD...why are we giving overseas aid at all ;especially to Indonesia when we have homeless people, hospitals, those who don't have jobs people living on the breadline, farmers who must be the toughest guys and gals on earth. look after us first: Ian nsw. 

Alain
Alain from NSW replied to ian:

I agree as far as Indonesia, we must hand out the vaccines for the kids those aid monies were used for but not give them cash, I am against the death penalty and they must be sanctioned. Nepal needs more than the 10 million stingy Julie has given them so far! 

ian
ian from NSW replied to Alain:

I have no problem with aid in the case of disaster relief to countries in time of crisis. I was referring to hand outs to countries that are mostly run by dictators or the army and the money never gets to the people who need it. 

Alain
Alain from NSW commented:

Can't find the word "housing" in the budget, can't find the words "climate change" neither... A totally UNFAIR budget, very UNAUSTRALIAN ! What about the concession on "Super" Superannuations (with tens or hundreds of millions of dollars, who get 45 cents in the $ concession !) ? The Concessions on Family Trusts? The concessions on negative gearing (as do most of our pollies, some possess over ten dwellings, is that the reason they keep those benefits?) ? The poor, the stay at home mothers, the Health system, the Education system are all hit SOOOO HARD (80 billion in cuts!) ! A Real shame this budget, not even talking about our lack of compassion for the developing countries! We have lost our prestige, Australia! 

John
John from VIC replied to Alain:

Why don't you put yourself up for election and see how you go. you seem to think you know it all. Doubt you'd last very long but you might learn something.. 

Alain
Alain from NSW replied to John:

Too many fascists here, blinded by their own selves and the almighty $... We have lost our conscience when you see the ease with which we breach our international obligations... We have no credibility on the planet anymore, hence the two in Indonesia suffered the consequences... We will have to catch up with a smart PM one day... 

Henry
Henry from NSW commented:

Whilst not helping self funded retirees( the hardest done by group in the nation) it is a real start to fix the mess left by labor,now it is up to the fools in the Senate to start looking after Australia and not themselves and pass the budget without changes. 

alistair
alistair from NSW commented:

Having retired in 1999 we have done without to save what little we have had over so that we would not be a burden on the on the Federal Govt only to discover that being prudent with any Govt you become a minority person. Now we are just over the threshhold so we now become disadvantaged while the Politicians just go about their work as if who cares so long as they can keep on living the life of Riley 

Antoinette
Antoinette from NSW commented:

I/we retired on 31/10/14, aged almost 67, & have received part pension (49%) and topping that up to about $50k from our super pool (480k) and a little interest & dividends. The cash we have came from my wife's modest super payout & my unused LSL and A/L. With the goal posts moved we will receive about 20% of the pension and super will not last as long as planned six months ago. Meanwhile costs like Private Health, virtually a necessity, continue to escalate. We are the ones who spend on holidays & lifestyle, so where will the extra employment come from? Most "tradies" & self- employed will not hire extra workers, they simply spread the extra within their own families. Thanks, Ron H. Penrith 

Deborah
Deborah from NSW commented:

As far as the pension goes I think the changes are fair in my grandmothers day everyone received the pension but we all must realise that's not possible today if you own yr home you shld be ok and I'm not sure if the $10,000 incentive for workers over 50 will make long term employment nothing to stop employers putting people off after payment or is there 

Lesley
Lesley from NSW commented:

what are the new rates for single homeowners 

Karen
Karen from NSW replied to Lesley:

My understanding is that single home owners can have up to $250,000 and still get a full pension (up $30,000) and up to $550,000 in assets other than their home before they lose the pension completely. 

Lesley
Lesley from NSW commented:

what are the new rates for single homeowners 

Noni
Noni from NSW commented:

I am 75 years of age and still working full time in real estate sales where I have worked for nearly 25 years. I am a carer to my 81 year old husband who suffers with dementia and Type 2 Diabetes. Fortunately I work close to home and can keep a check on my husband who thankfully is not a wanderer. This coming year I am unable to make a contribution ( the limit has been $35,000 p.a.)to my Super Fund because I will be over 75. Has there been some thought given to this? Does the bonus come in at the end of my working career? I intend to work for as long as I possibly can. 

Comment Guidelines