News

NewsWhat the Budget means for FiftyUps
What the Budget means for FiftyUps

What the Budget means for FiftyUps

What the Budget means for FiftyUps

Everyone else is giving their verdict on the Budget today, so it’s important us older Australians get a word in edgeways – especially since issues around retirement planning have been, and will remain, a key battleground.

We’ve created a succinct survey on Joe Hockey’s plans for you to rate their fairness, impact, ability to change your vote and to meet our long-term challenges.

Please click here to rate the Budget

So… what was there in it for you? It largely depends on your age, income and assets but there are key changes to pension eligibility and incentives to keep older Aussies in w

ork.

Much of this we knew before Tuesday night, due to planned ‘leaks’, but now the political horse-trading begins meaning it’s even more important to know where your interests lie.

Cost of Living

The Treasurer seemed to take credit for the cost of living falling, due to somewhat cheaper electricity post the carbon tax and lower mortgage rates thanks to the Reserve Bank. He also told the ABC “petrol is cheaper than it has been”.

I’m sure a few self-funded retirees, suffering from still-very high energy and petrol bills and hit by ever lower interest rates on bank deposits, might beg to differ.

Pensions.

Joe Hockey sought to inspire some confidence on retirement incomes.

“I want to reassure all Australian workers that they can have confidence in their retirement plans under this government. There will be no new taxes on superannuation under this government, and their age pension will continue to increase twice a year this year and every year at the highest available index rate,” he said last night.

 “These measures are all intended to provide security and and certainty for older australians in the years ahead.”

The key ‘benefit’ to all pensioners is the dropping of plans to reduce the rate at which they were indexed. It never happened but generated plenty of fear and anger.

Despite fears of cuts to the Pensioner Concession Card, which delivers much-appreciated discounts on public transport, utilities, medicines and GPs, it has also been quarantined from changes.

So those who might lose access to the pension with the new assets test and still have the card will keep it.

But the real meat of the changes for older Australians involved tightening the pensions assets test, to keep the pension – more than 10% of government spending – sustainable and affordable.

The new thresholds to the pension-asset test and changes to the taper rate will see 50,000 more of us get the full pension. In addition, 122,000 part-pensioners will get another $30 a fortnight.

But the $44 billion annual bill for the Age Pension bill has been cut by $2.4 billion and there are some losers who, while they may be portrayed as relatively well-off, will have complaints.

By the government’s own figures they include 91,000 who will lose the pension altogether and 235,000 who will find their pension reduced.

The changes have been largely greeted by seniors’ group but analysts have pointed out it brings uncertainty into the incentives to save for your retirement. Under the changes some people who’ve saved more will end up worse off than those who’ve saved less.

In simple terms, as outlined by Andrew Main in Tuesday’s The Australian a home-owning couple, with assets outside the house worth less than $600,000, get a higher income than an otherwise similar couple with assets worth between $650,000- $1.1million.

He says the changes to the taper rate would leave a couple with $800,000 of assets about $12,000 a year worse off.

The argument around who gets what in the pension will continue, and that means over-50s will continue to feel insecure.

Work

The incentives for employers to engage older workers are to be overhauled with faster access to a $10,000 subsidy for hiring new workers aged over 50.

The program called Restart is meant to make it easier for older workers to get jobs. The Treasurer said the changes were designed to make the subsidies more available when and where they were needed.

You have to wonder whether the scheme is not working, given it’s only a year old.

There will also be a scheme to offer better training for older workers to find work instead of relying on benefits, which the FiftyUp Club has been calling for over a year. Read more about Seniors concerned about job competition here

HAVE YOUR SAY: 

Was the Budget fair on FiftyUps? How will it affect you? Is it the right Budget for Australia in 2015?

Take our 2-minute Post-Budget Snap Poll and rate the Government's fiscal efforts HERE

Originally posted on .

Join the conversation

FiftyUp Club
What the Budget means for FiftyUps

Share your views with other members. 

Want to leave a comment? or .
Read our moderation policy here.
Tony
Tony from NSW commented:

I believe the family home should be included in the assets test above a certain value. For example if the limit is set at $1,000,000 and your home is worth $1,500,000 then $500,000 should be counted in the assets test. After all why should tax payers 'donate' part of their hard-earned wages towards pensioners who are sitting on extremely valuable homes just so their kids can benefit when Mum and Dad are gone. Tony, Camden NSW 

Ivan
Ivan from VIC commented:

Stop feeding migrants namely from Islam countries,system where you get something for nothing sucks,get rid of perks of politicians,attacking pensioners is an offence to them, family allowance should be for locals not migrants who have done nothing for society,tougher laws on crime such as murders, rapes, street fights and attacks, no paroles once sentenced,deport terror suspect at once,should I go on ?? 

Alain
Alain from NSW replied to Ivan:

Was a mistake to invade Iraq, wasn't it? 

Larry
Larry from NSW commented:

I believe it is a good budget with the government trying to improve the economy in Australia after labor left the country in the biggest debt every with their wastage and massive spending and people have to realise that it won't be done overnight and we have to keep labour out of government for many years or it will be repeated again 

Alain
Alain from NSW replied to Larry:

You must be kidding, no? 

Larry
Larry from NSW replied to Alain:

No Alain I am not kidding you are kidding if you don't remember the mess labor left us in 

Fay
Fay from QLD replied to Larry:

And the Coalition isn't getting us deeper in debt with all the handouts they've been accounting they are borrowing to pay for those. 

Larry
Larry from NSW replied to Fay:

you are kidding labor went in with a massive surplus and when left had the worse debt this country has ever had and it seems every time labors in we get more into debt 

Alain
Alain from NSW replied to Larry:

So let's take from the poor to give to the better-offs, you are right ... 

Alain
Alain from NSW replied to Fay:

Only a 35 billion deficit in 2015/2016 !!! 

Larry
Larry from NSW replied to Alain:

think about it labor created this mess and the coalition has to get us out of it , and labor deficit was more than that ( fact) and the mess they left with their blunders and massive spending 

Alain
Alain from NSW replied to Larry:

You are either very rich or not in tune with the reality of a majority here: the deficit is a pretext, these guys are incapable of creating jobs , they "move money" the Libs, they are incompetent at the helm of a ship, we will sink in a difficult conjecture, they base their calculations on optimistic (unreal in fact!) figures, no guarantee that China will do well, that the Aussi $ will move the way they planned, that they won't be a recession, that the price of iron ore will not tumble as happened before (was $20 a ton, before for "ever"...)... YOU BET THE DEFICIT WILL HAVE ACCRUED IN YEAR 2019/2020 ? They are bull s*** artists, not statesmen, just plain ridiculous fascist pollies looking after themselves and their rich friends... 

Alain
Alain from NSW replied to Larry:

No mess, no, do not let the LNP brainwash you... 

Larry
Larry from NSW replied to Alain:

you are no doubt brainwashed by the useless labor party you don't think labor left us in a mess gee you are brainwashed, I really feel sorry for you 

Ricky
Ricky from QLD commented:

What gov department can I contact for retraining a 56 year old back into the workforce after being made redundant. 

Someone
Someone from NSW replied to Ricky:

ricky you would need to go through centrelink who would put you in touch with a job provider ,then you could do a course either through them or tafe etc 

Barry
Barry from NSW commented:

Then you have to find a company that has a vacancy and will employ you 

Marcia
Marcia from NSW commented:

Lynn,I don't believe the family home is going to be included as an asset,because the opposition opposed the previous government doesn't mean it was right . In theory politicians are supposed to be working for the betterment of the country . 

Allan
Allan from NSW commented:

Marcia, your comment is spot on. The Senate should be a house of review, not a house of obstruction. Get rid of the senators and save the country a lot of money. 

Someone
Someone from NSW commented:

to me the budget helps small business the most letting them spend and write off $20,000 .It does not mean they are going to employ any extra people. I am 55+ work part time as a cleaner on minumum wage ,on newstart, I volunteer 4hrs a fortnight and babysit the grandkids so my daughter can work life is a total struggle .sometimes I think pensioners don't relise how lucky they are with discounts on rego rates etc 

Kevin
Kevin from QLD commented:

As an aged pensioner, I agree with Anonymous of NSW who said "sometimes I think pensioners don't realise how lucky they are etc". While we may not live in clover, we in Australia are indeed fortunate. It must also be acknowledged Australia is in a transition phase where most older Australians did not have the opportunity to save for retirement; those in my age bracket were able to partially "save" through the introduction of the superannuation scheme and attendant increased awareness of the benefits of superannuation even if not a wage earner where the employer contributed; and the next phase will be when people who have worked through their productive years with not only the ongoing employer-funded superannuation scheme, but also ever increasing awareness of the benefits of providing for old age combined with the realisation the time is near when the nation cannot afford an ever-escalating welfare cost. 

Lynn
Lynn from NSW commented:

I thought that you only obtained a full pension if you were born before 1955 - or has that changed and compulsory superannuation was started to help those people retiring who were born after 1955. It still seems like the Abbott government is trying to rort pensioners, handicapped & disadvantaged. I'd like to see Hockey/Abbott live off the pension - lets face it they are settled for life when they retire from politics.. We spend millions overseas but can't spend millions to help our own. 

Allan
Allan from NSW commented:

All these changes aimed at us "peasants" are noted, but what about the politicians? Are they to be exempt from the cost cutting? Maybe they should be asked to tighten their belts too! 

Marcia
Marcia from NSW commented:

If the Opposition and senate really wanted what's best for the country, ,instead of mindless opposing everything ,the country would improve . We don't need a senate 

Lynn
Lynn from NSW replied to Marcia:

They are doing exactly the same thing that the Liberals did when they were in opposition....... doesn't sit well does it. 

Comment Guidelines