News

NewsWhat the Budget means for FiftyUps
What the Budget means for FiftyUps

What the Budget means for FiftyUps

What the Budget means for FiftyUps

Everyone else is giving their verdict on the Budget today, so it’s important us older Australians get a word in edgeways – especially since issues around retirement planning have been, and will remain, a key battleground.

We’ve created a succinct survey on Joe Hockey’s plans for you to rate their fairness, impact, ability to change your vote and to meet our long-term challenges.

Please click here to rate the Budget

So… what was there in it for you? It largely depends on your age, income and assets but there are key changes to pension eligibility and incentives to keep older Aussies in w

ork.

Much of this we knew before Tuesday night, due to planned ‘leaks’, but now the political horse-trading begins meaning it’s even more important to know where your interests lie.

Cost of Living

The Treasurer seemed to take credit for the cost of living falling, due to somewhat cheaper electricity post the carbon tax and lower mortgage rates thanks to the Reserve Bank. He also told the ABC “petrol is cheaper than it has been”.

I’m sure a few self-funded retirees, suffering from still-very high energy and petrol bills and hit by ever lower interest rates on bank deposits, might beg to differ.

Pensions.

Joe Hockey sought to inspire some confidence on retirement incomes.

“I want to reassure all Australian workers that they can have confidence in their retirement plans under this government. There will be no new taxes on superannuation under this government, and their age pension will continue to increase twice a year this year and every year at the highest available index rate,” he said last night.

 “These measures are all intended to provide security and and certainty for older australians in the years ahead.”

The key ‘benefit’ to all pensioners is the dropping of plans to reduce the rate at which they were indexed. It never happened but generated plenty of fear and anger.

Despite fears of cuts to the Pensioner Concession Card, which delivers much-appreciated discounts on public transport, utilities, medicines and GPs, it has also been quarantined from changes.

So those who might lose access to the pension with the new assets test and still have the card will keep it.

But the real meat of the changes for older Australians involved tightening the pensions assets test, to keep the pension – more than 10% of government spending – sustainable and affordable.

The new thresholds to the pension-asset test and changes to the taper rate will see 50,000 more of us get the full pension. In addition, 122,000 part-pensioners will get another $30 a fortnight.

But the $44 billion annual bill for the Age Pension bill has been cut by $2.4 billion and there are some losers who, while they may be portrayed as relatively well-off, will have complaints.

By the government’s own figures they include 91,000 who will lose the pension altogether and 235,000 who will find their pension reduced.

The changes have been largely greeted by seniors’ group but analysts have pointed out it brings uncertainty into the incentives to save for your retirement. Under the changes some people who’ve saved more will end up worse off than those who’ve saved less.

In simple terms, as outlined by Andrew Main in Tuesday’s The Australian a home-owning couple, with assets outside the house worth less than $600,000, get a higher income than an otherwise similar couple with assets worth between $650,000- $1.1million.

He says the changes to the taper rate would leave a couple with $800,000 of assets about $12,000 a year worse off.

The argument around who gets what in the pension will continue, and that means over-50s will continue to feel insecure.

Work

The incentives for employers to engage older workers are to be overhauled with faster access to a $10,000 subsidy for hiring new workers aged over 50.

The program called Restart is meant to make it easier for older workers to get jobs. The Treasurer said the changes were designed to make the subsidies more available when and where they were needed.

You have to wonder whether the scheme is not working, given it’s only a year old.

There will also be a scheme to offer better training for older workers to find work instead of relying on benefits, which the FiftyUp Club has been calling for over a year. Read more about Seniors concerned about job competition here

HAVE YOUR SAY: 

Was the Budget fair on FiftyUps? How will it affect you? Is it the right Budget for Australia in 2015?

Take our 2-minute Post-Budget Snap Poll and rate the Government's fiscal efforts HERE

Originally posted on .

Join the conversation

FiftyUp Club
What the Budget means for FiftyUps

Share your views with other members. 

Want to leave a comment? or .
Read our moderation policy here.
Alain
Alain from NSW commented:

I am 81 and everything in my life (rent, food, etc...) has become so expensive my small income cannot cope, I am planning to look for a job, I am still alert and fit. Would anyone needs a mature hard working labourer out there? 

Alain
Alain from NSW replied to Alain:

You would receive $10000 from the government and you won't find everyday someone with 65 years experience at laying bricks. 

Alain
Alain from NSW replied to Alain:

I intend to die on the job (I've never een on holidays) as this government wants it (sorry I cannot spend what I have not got). 

kerri
kerri from NSW commented:

I am in my early sixties and we would like to downsize but we are damned if we are going to hand over our hard earned retirement cash to the government for stamp duty on another residence. We should be exempt when we reach a certain age and wish to downsize. I am sure there are a lot of us out there who feel the same as me. Why doesn't the government change these stamp duty laws. They give to first home buyers, what about Gods waiting room home buyers 

Alain
Alain from NSW commented:

-Continued - The End) According to Mr Kurlantzick, Mr Abbott's "coarse rhetoric" had embarrassed Australia at major economic summits and that his decision to knight the "notoriously gaffe-prone and fusty Prince Philip" had gone down poorly even among his most conservative supporters. "I take no position on whether a left or right coalition can govern Australia better – whether Australia needs a revolt from within the ruling coalition or a national election victory by the left," he wrote in conclusion. "But a country that for decades has punched above its weight on nearly every international issue surely can do much better for a prime minister than Tony Abbott." 

Alain
Alain from NSW commented:

Here is what the LNP's buffs voted for -and are supporting-, Abbott seen from the USA, to support myself my claim down there as a reply to one of you: Published on the Council on Foreign Relations website before Mr Abbott survived a spill motion on Monday, the piece argues that he has proven so "shockingly incompetent" that he deserved to lose his job.. "Abbott has proven so incapable of clear policy thinking, so unwilling to consult with even his own ministers and advisers, and so poor at communicating that he has to go," wrote the CFR senior fellow Joshua Kurlantzick, a US specialist in south-east Asian politics. "Abbott's policies have been all over the map, and the lack of coherence has often made the prime minister seem ill-informed and incapable of understanding complex policy issues," he wrote. "In press conferences, Abbott has offered mixed public messages about some of the health care reforms that were at the centre of his agenda, and sometimes has seemed unsure himself of what health legislation has actually been passed on his watch. He also has seemed unsure of what he promised in the past regarding Australia's major public broadcaster – he promised not to touch it – before he went ahead made cuts to it. He also looked completely baffled on climate change issues at the G20 summit in Australia last year." Mr Kurlantzick argued that Mr Abbott's failure to consult with senior ministers about key issues had made it harder to pass critical legislation, and that Mr Abbott had what appeared to have "one of the worst senses of public relations of any prime minister in recent Australian history." .../... 

Someone
Someone from NSW commented:

I don't understand a lot about politics but I do know that the politicians are not looking to reduce their pensions in any shape or form. Why not leave us older people to save for our retirement and be glad that we do and are not seeking handouts. 

Carol
Carol from NSW commented:

I agree with Ivan from Victoria 

Alain
Alain from NSW replied to Carol:

Was a mistake to invade Iraq, wasn't it? Look at the result! 

Fay
Fay from QLD commented:

One of the key things that not many comments have bee named about is the fact that the PBS will change. From 2016 I think it is the number of scripts people will need to access the free part of the Scheme will rise by 3 and keep rising by 3, there is a cut off year though. Eventually no one will get free medication at all but the y will be paying through the nose for scripts as old Joe doesn't realise that the amount people pay for each script also rises every year. Off course all this depends on the Coalition being re-elected I n the next Federal Election and the way Hockey is handing out money to families get ready for an early election. I'm tipping either mid December or late January like Campbell Newman did in Queensland and the excuse will be they cant get anything passed in the Senate. 

Alain
Alain from NSW replied to Fay:

Brilliant ! 

Kaye
Kaye from NSW commented:

What of the incentive of $10,000 a year for older workers who work after 65? 

Fay
Fay from QLD replied to Kaye:

That's for the employer who actually employs people over 50. It replaces the over 50 Rebate on the Income Tax Return. 

Gillian
Gillian from QLD commented:

It appears to be a budget to stimulate growth and we certainly need growth in the manufacturing industry as we have seen so many businesses going off shore or shutting down because they could not compete with cheap imports. This is certainly not a budget from which I would gain but I wasn't looking for any handouts. I'm a self-funded, wage- earner retiree who has tried to build super for retirement through post tax contributions. I believe that we all need to take as much responsibility as possible for ourselves so we do not add to the enormous financial burden that Australia is facing. I know many retirees who manipulate their super to get the pension. There are so many needy people, especially those with mental and physical health issues, including those from armed services, to be cared for. Let us just hope that the negative opposition does not block everything in the Senate! It was to be predicted that Leigh Sales's negativity was evident even in her opening remarks on ABC last night. ABC has spent so much air play denigrating the federal government and gossip mongering to promote the imminent downfall of various government members. 

Carol
Carol from NSW commented:

I hope they are going to assess every person who receives a pension, not just the honest ones who they know everything about any way. I know people who have been on a pension over 20 years and never have to fill out an income and assets form. I don't mind paying my fair share but after 47 years of putting in a tax form it does make me angry that someone who has never worked or paid tax, we are supposed to feel sorry for, and they reap all the benefits If I knew that being frugal and going without to save for a comfortable retirement , I wouldn't have bothered. 

Comment Guidelines