News

NewsWhat the Budget means for FiftyUps
What the Budget means for FiftyUps

What the Budget means for FiftyUps

What the Budget means for FiftyUps

Everyone else is giving their verdict on the Budget today, so it’s important us older Australians get a word in edgeways – especially since issues around retirement planning have been, and will remain, a key battleground.

We’ve created a succinct survey on Joe Hockey’s plans for you to rate their fairness, impact, ability to change your vote and to meet our long-term challenges.

Please click here to rate the Budget

So… what was there in it for you? It largely depends on your age, income and assets but there are key changes to pension eligibility and incentives to keep older Aussies in w

ork.

Much of this we knew before Tuesday night, due to planned ‘leaks’, but now the political horse-trading begins meaning it’s even more important to know where your interests lie.

Cost of Living

The Treasurer seemed to take credit for the cost of living falling, due to somewhat cheaper electricity post the carbon tax and lower mortgage rates thanks to the Reserve Bank. He also told the ABC “petrol is cheaper than it has been”.

I’m sure a few self-funded retirees, suffering from still-very high energy and petrol bills and hit by ever lower interest rates on bank deposits, might beg to differ.

Pensions.

Joe Hockey sought to inspire some confidence on retirement incomes.

“I want to reassure all Australian workers that they can have confidence in their retirement plans under this government. There will be no new taxes on superannuation under this government, and their age pension will continue to increase twice a year this year and every year at the highest available index rate,” he said last night.

 “These measures are all intended to provide security and and certainty for older australians in the years ahead.”

The key ‘benefit’ to all pensioners is the dropping of plans to reduce the rate at which they were indexed. It never happened but generated plenty of fear and anger.

Despite fears of cuts to the Pensioner Concession Card, which delivers much-appreciated discounts on public transport, utilities, medicines and GPs, it has also been quarantined from changes.

So those who might lose access to the pension with the new assets test and still have the card will keep it.

But the real meat of the changes for older Australians involved tightening the pensions assets test, to keep the pension – more than 10% of government spending – sustainable and affordable.

The new thresholds to the pension-asset test and changes to the taper rate will see 50,000 more of us get the full pension. In addition, 122,000 part-pensioners will get another $30 a fortnight.

But the $44 billion annual bill for the Age Pension bill has been cut by $2.4 billion and there are some losers who, while they may be portrayed as relatively well-off, will have complaints.

By the government’s own figures they include 91,000 who will lose the pension altogether and 235,000 who will find their pension reduced.

The changes have been largely greeted by seniors’ group but analysts have pointed out it brings uncertainty into the incentives to save for your retirement. Under the changes some people who’ve saved more will end up worse off than those who’ve saved less.

In simple terms, as outlined by Andrew Main in Tuesday’s The Australian a home-owning couple, with assets outside the house worth less than $600,000, get a higher income than an otherwise similar couple with assets worth between $650,000- $1.1million.

He says the changes to the taper rate would leave a couple with $800,000 of assets about $12,000 a year worse off.

The argument around who gets what in the pension will continue, and that means over-50s will continue to feel insecure.

Work

The incentives for employers to engage older workers are to be overhauled with faster access to a $10,000 subsidy for hiring new workers aged over 50.

The program called Restart is meant to make it easier for older workers to get jobs. The Treasurer said the changes were designed to make the subsidies more available when and where they were needed.

You have to wonder whether the scheme is not working, given it’s only a year old.

There will also be a scheme to offer better training for older workers to find work instead of relying on benefits, which the FiftyUp Club has been calling for over a year. Read more about Seniors concerned about job competition here

HAVE YOUR SAY: 

Was the Budget fair on FiftyUps? How will it affect you? Is it the right Budget for Australia in 2015?

Take our 2-minute Post-Budget Snap Poll and rate the Government's fiscal efforts HERE

Originally posted on .

Join the conversation

FiftyUp Club
What the Budget means for FiftyUps

Share your views with other members. 

Want to leave a comment? or .
Read our moderation policy here.
John
John from QLD commented:

What a difference a Senate can make to pompus Polititions the only problem is they could not be trusted last time and now they are saying the crisis was a falicy well so was voting them in Jt qld 

Donald
Donald from QLD commented:

I disagree with the notion that people with over 650,000 to 1.1 million need assistance, I personally know of a couple who have assets probably in excess of these figures, every 15 months or so they take another overseas holiday and yet they get a part pension. The male person of this duo was not born in this country and spent a considerable amount of his working life outside Australia but because he married an Australian woman he gets a handout whereas i've worked all my life and never taken any handouts from the gov't until I retired, but then it was their law brought in by that boofhead Lionel Murphy where divorced couples have to share their assets, this is a trick played out by many women so that they can lay claim to most of your super and go off and have a good time with their new partner, and leave you with the house and not much else. I can get by on the age pension but I certainly don't take holidays and in order to take just one trip before I die I'll have to resort to a reverse mortgage.The laws in this country are like most of the politicians absolutely stagnant when it comes to realising what is really occurring on struggle street and equity is just another one of those words they throw around at election time to make themselves feel good and to feed us more mushrooms. 

Barbara
Barbara from QLD commented:

Thanks a lot Mr Hockey. After having a go all my life, and downsizing in March in a new over 50's village, and paying over $55,000 in gst and helping with employment ect. Your new rules on the single pension, will put my income as about $ 20,000 per year due to the low interest rates, my current pension is about a third of what it was before I downsized, You want seniors to do this but when they do the maths , theres no way the will want to live on such a meagre income, our savings will run out real soon. Single pensioners are the ones hit the hardest, as they have to pay the same bills,as a couple. It was very hard on me to move into something smaller on my own , without my late husband. So thanks for pulling the rug out of a 74 year old, who once again had a go. 

Tina
Tina from VIC commented:

Does "assets outside the family home" mean the amount in superannuation? 

Geoff
Geoff from QLD replied to Tina:

Yes and any other form of asset such as coins, bank accounts, art, cars etc etc 

Johnson
Johnson from VIC commented:

I may be old and a pensioner but I still have my faculties, I wish Joe Hockey had time to come and talk to my strawberries, think of the crop, not the crap, why do these so called 'leaders' actually give so little thought in an individual manner. Their words are only there to cover their own 'R ses', we are the brains and the muscle that made this a once great country, think, you ignorant politicians, about Australia, put your Liberal and Labor heads together and get the country straight, THEN, think about yourselves, what choice do we, the voter have! 

Graeme
Graeme from VIC commented:

Still have not seen the fine detail about the changes to the aged pension which will come in during 2017. Any chance the Fifty Up Club provides the details. 

David
David from NSW commented:

Very little has been said about single ex Service Personnel who are now Self Funded Retirees aged in their late 80's and 90's so there are not many of us left..................but to those of us who are still alive and feebly kicking.........where do we stand..............no where in particular ? 

Peter
Peter from QLD commented:

The treasurer stated he wants to see people get ahead. When they do he pulls the rug from under them. 

Brian
Brian from VIC commented:

If this government wants to help pensioners, make them all exempt GST. If you want to stop all this political interference by minor parties, drop the ridiculous preferential voting system. and go to a one man ,one vote method. I fail to see why part of my vote goes to parties that I don't want to win. 

Alain
Alain from NSW replied to Brian:

The ethereal concept of democracy! 

Alain
Alain from NSW replied to Brian:

Some currently sitting in the chambers received 1000 or so votes! Democracy Australia style! I voted for the 'sex party' (safe with me) so funny the idea of having sex mixed with politics, it gave me a big laugh and I am pretty sure they would perform better than the idiots we have at the helm at the moment... 

Anthony
Anthony from QLD commented:

It does not seem to matter which political power is in charge, pensioners always appear to be the loser. The recent increase in our pension of $9.60 was quickly gobbled up with a increase of over $10 per month in private insurance. Also I noticed that some prescriptions which were originally $6.10 have now increased some $2.50. This makes the pension increase a total joke. We have paid our taxes over a period of some fifty years but all were are good for is a pittance. I would like to see some of these big mouth politicians survive on what is allocated to us. 

Alain
Alain from NSW replied to Anthony:

The Libs are going to make you PAY if you are poor, hence do not vote for them: that is all which count for them, $ for them their party and their friends. In the UK people cannot access several important cancer treatments at the forefront of therapies, now if they are not loaded... 

Geoff
Geoff from QLD replied to Alain:

Labor will make you poorer still. 

Alain
Alain from NSW replied to Geoff:

No social progress without Labor, bosses would have you work 24/7 for peanuts without Labor, sorry mate you must be one of those privileged bosses, but we are not monkeys neither... You time will come, we will be broke with this far right of politics before you even have the time to think about it, China goes, we go and many fortunes with it... 

Comment Guidelines