News

NewsWhat the Budget means for FiftyUps
What the Budget means for FiftyUps

What the Budget means for FiftyUps

What the Budget means for FiftyUps

Everyone else is giving their verdict on the Budget today, so it’s important us older Australians get a word in edgeways – especially since issues around retirement planning have been, and will remain, a key battleground.

We’ve created a succinct survey on Joe Hockey’s plans for you to rate their fairness, impact, ability to change your vote and to meet our long-term challenges.

Please click here to rate the Budget

So… what was there in it for you? It largely depends on your age, income and assets but there are key changes to pension eligibility and incentives to keep older Aussies in w

ork.

Much of this we knew before Tuesday night, due to planned ‘leaks’, but now the political horse-trading begins meaning it’s even more important to know where your interests lie.

Cost of Living

The Treasurer seemed to take credit for the cost of living falling, due to somewhat cheaper electricity post the carbon tax and lower mortgage rates thanks to the Reserve Bank. He also told the ABC “petrol is cheaper than it has been”.

I’m sure a few self-funded retirees, suffering from still-very high energy and petrol bills and hit by ever lower interest rates on bank deposits, might beg to differ.

Pensions.

Joe Hockey sought to inspire some confidence on retirement incomes.

“I want to reassure all Australian workers that they can have confidence in their retirement plans under this government. There will be no new taxes on superannuation under this government, and their age pension will continue to increase twice a year this year and every year at the highest available index rate,” he said last night.

 “These measures are all intended to provide security and and certainty for older australians in the years ahead.”

The key ‘benefit’ to all pensioners is the dropping of plans to reduce the rate at which they were indexed. It never happened but generated plenty of fear and anger.

Despite fears of cuts to the Pensioner Concession Card, which delivers much-appreciated discounts on public transport, utilities, medicines and GPs, it has also been quarantined from changes.

So those who might lose access to the pension with the new assets test and still have the card will keep it.

But the real meat of the changes for older Australians involved tightening the pensions assets test, to keep the pension – more than 10% of government spending – sustainable and affordable.

The new thresholds to the pension-asset test and changes to the taper rate will see 50,000 more of us get the full pension. In addition, 122,000 part-pensioners will get another $30 a fortnight.

But the $44 billion annual bill for the Age Pension bill has been cut by $2.4 billion and there are some losers who, while they may be portrayed as relatively well-off, will have complaints.

By the government’s own figures they include 91,000 who will lose the pension altogether and 235,000 who will find their pension reduced.

The changes have been largely greeted by seniors’ group but analysts have pointed out it brings uncertainty into the incentives to save for your retirement. Under the changes some people who’ve saved more will end up worse off than those who’ve saved less.

In simple terms, as outlined by Andrew Main in Tuesday’s The Australian a home-owning couple, with assets outside the house worth less than $600,000, get a higher income than an otherwise similar couple with assets worth between $650,000- $1.1million.

He says the changes to the taper rate would leave a couple with $800,000 of assets about $12,000 a year worse off.

The argument around who gets what in the pension will continue, and that means over-50s will continue to feel insecure.

Work

The incentives for employers to engage older workers are to be overhauled with faster access to a $10,000 subsidy for hiring new workers aged over 50.

The program called Restart is meant to make it easier for older workers to get jobs. The Treasurer said the changes were designed to make the subsidies more available when and where they were needed.

You have to wonder whether the scheme is not working, given it’s only a year old.

There will also be a scheme to offer better training for older workers to find work instead of relying on benefits, which the FiftyUp Club has been calling for over a year. Read more about Seniors concerned about job competition here

HAVE YOUR SAY: 

Was the Budget fair on FiftyUps? How will it affect you? Is it the right Budget for Australia in 2015?

Take our 2-minute Post-Budget Snap Poll and rate the Government's fiscal efforts HERE

Originally posted on .

Join the conversation

FiftyUp Club
What the Budget means for FiftyUps

Share your views with other members. 

Want to leave a comment? or .
Read our moderation policy here.
Someone
Someone from QLD commented:

Restart for jobseekers 50 and over is an utter joke. One needs to be a recipient of income support to qualify for an employer to hire you and gets the subsidy. Those of us who are not on income support but rely on superannuation/savings to survive also want to get a job. Employers and recruitment agencies make it impossible for us to get the foot in. I have years of work experience in customer service, administration, accounts but each time I applied for a job, I got knocked back with some lame excuses I acted superior just because I analysed a group case study and worked out the best approaches. I was told I could try again and when I did I was put through with jeering from the recruitment consultant saying I didn't do so well previously when in fact my assessments were in the percentile of 85%. The assessments I did the second time round were exactly the same as the first 

Someone
Someone from QLD commented:

Restart for jobseekers 50 and over is an utter joke. One needs to be a recipient of income support to qualify for an employer to hire you and gets the subsidy. Those of us who are not on income support but rely on superannuation/savings to survive also want to get a job. Employers and recruitment agencies make it impossible for us to get the foot in. I have years of work experience in customer service, administration, accounts but each time I applied for a job, I got knocked back with some lame excuses I acted superior just because I analysed a group case study and worked out the best approaches. I was told I could try again and when I did I was put through with jeering from the recruitment consultant saying I didn't do so well previously when in fact my assessments were in the percentile of 85%. The assessments I did the second time round were exactly the same as the first 

Alain
Alain from NSW commented:

Found this comment on the GP Tax still 'in disguise' in that Budget : Tony Abbott said the GP Tax was dead, buried and cremated. We all thought that was probably another lie, and on Tuesday night we were proven right. In the Budget the Government has tried to introduce a GP Tax by stealth. By introducing a four year freeze on payments to GPs, the Government is ripping $1.3 billion out of Medicare and effectively introducing an $8.43 GP Tax though the back door. 

Janette
Janette from NSW commented:

I am concerned for the "chronically ill They can be all ages, some able to work, some not, due to their problems. I have a daughter who Needs a lot of medication, more than my husband and myself, yet we reach the '"Safety cap"' Before she does. The difference here, is that she is Single! Yes she does work and loves it, not able to full time though, due to pain and mobility difficulties, and could not manage without some help from me. So losing out even a little bit will just make it even more difficult. Single people have a hard time in comparison with couples, altogether, from housing to insurances etc, quite apart from the emotional loneness. Please Rethink. 

Judith
Judith from QLD replied to Janette:

I agree single people are struggling in comparison to couples-we seem to be charged more to make up the difference to what married/couples pay-weather it is going on holidays or as you say housing to insurance or even joining a club(which I won't do because to having to pay more than what two living as a couple do. 

Alain
Alain from NSW replied to Janette:

If you are concerned, let me tell you something Janette: it is the last of their worries people on small income, whether able or disable, they assume such people do not vote for their party (the LNP coalition) and therefore will 'punish' them if they can, they are only interested in protecting their privileges and those of their rich friends, this budget (and the previous one) proves my point, it is a real shame... 

Ruth
Ruth from NSW commented:

Wondering when Centrelink will contact pensioners if they are to retain their part-pension or have it reduced or lose it. I still work part-time at age 71, but my asset base is near $500.000, so am concerned to hear from Centrelink asap, as to getting advice. 

Alain
Alain from NSW replied to Ruth:

Wait for that toxic budget to be approved, and if they are as smart as I think they are (have been...) there is NO CHANCE that such a pathetic (like the ones who put it together) budget goes thru... 

Eric
Eric from NSW commented:

asset test to LOW.They asked us to save ,when we do they want to take it away. 

Darryl
Darryl from NSW commented:

I am quite annoyed. My wife & I are both 60 & working full time. We have 900K in a SMSF and obviously will not receive any pension. We are NOT rich & the funds will probably give a return of 35K to 40K pa (if we're lucky!) 

Tony
Tony from QLD commented:

Well here we go again. Lets makes those that have not pay for those that have. Typical Liberal strategy seen it all before. How can we get together and make the pollies pensions and perks the same as all other Australian citizens, then they might wake up and realize what it is like to support yourself on what they offer. 

Alain
Alain from NSW commented:

(Continued - The End) The 656-page report, its 25th edition, reviews human rights practices in more than 90 countries ranging from so-called democratic nations such as the United States, France and Australia to trouble spots including Iraq and Syria.Last year, the Abbott government rushed through several new counterterrorism offences imposing criminal penalties for “advocating terrorism” and travelling to “declared areas” abroad, as well as making unauthorised disclosures of information related to “special intelligence operations.” The reforms also contained tough penalties for journalists and whistleblowers, who could be jailed for up to 10 years for “recklessly” disclosing information related to a “special intelligence operation”. “Australia’s new counterterrorism laws mean journalists, whistleblowers, and activists will risk prison for certain disclosures — even if it’s in the public interest,” Ms Pearson said. But our counterterrorism laws aren’t the only thing to have landed us on the shame list (and you are welcome to ask me for "the rest" i.e. our FOREIGN POLICY HYPOCRISY, the DANGER OF BEING DISABLED in Australia, etc, etc...) . 

Alain
Alain from NSW commented:

Also what bothers me with this government is the fact that we Aussies have been 'named and shamed' BIG time! AUSTRALIA has been named and shamed on a list of the world’s worst human rights offenders — but it’s not just our treatment of indigenous people and asylum seekers that has landed us there writes news .com. au: Sharing the dubious honours with the likes of Syria, Nigeria and Egypt, we have made the cut for reasons you might not expect. According to Human Rights Watch’s World Report 2015, our counterterrorism laws — hastily introduced by the Abbott government last year — have been slammed as “vague” and “over-broad” in the damning report, infringing on the basic rights of all Australians. In response to the threat of home-grown terrorism, new laws extend to the use of control orders and preventive detention and also make it a criminal offence to travel to “declared areas’’ abroad, which overly restricts people’s freedom of movement, the report states. The controversial proposal that would force telecommunications companies to retain metadata for use by intelligence organisations has also been slammed. The laws would essentially give Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO) unprecedented power to monitor the entire Australian web with only one warrant. “Draconian counterterrorism laws undermining free speech are causing incalculable damage to Australia’s international standing as a rights-respecting country,” warns Australian director of HRW Elaine Pearson. “The government rammed these measures through parliament despite their having lasting consequences on Australians’ civil liberties.” “These are excessive restrictions on freedom of speech, so a whole range of peaceful conduct can be prosecuted under these laws — something that affects the civil liberties of all Australians.” .../... 

Comment Guidelines