News

NewsWhat the Budget means for FiftyUps
What the Budget means for FiftyUps

What the Budget means for FiftyUps

What the Budget means for FiftyUps

Everyone else is giving their verdict on the Budget today, so it’s important us older Australians get a word in edgeways – especially since issues around retirement planning have been, and will remain, a key battleground.

We’ve created a succinct survey on Joe Hockey’s plans for you to rate their fairness, impact, ability to change your vote and to meet our long-term challenges.

Please click here to rate the Budget

So… what was there in it for you? It largely depends on your age, income and assets but there are key changes to pension eligibility and incentives to keep older Aussies in w

ork.

Much of this we knew before Tuesday night, due to planned ‘leaks’, but now the political horse-trading begins meaning it’s even more important to know where your interests lie.

Cost of Living

The Treasurer seemed to take credit for the cost of living falling, due to somewhat cheaper electricity post the carbon tax and lower mortgage rates thanks to the Reserve Bank. He also told the ABC “petrol is cheaper than it has been”.

I’m sure a few self-funded retirees, suffering from still-very high energy and petrol bills and hit by ever lower interest rates on bank deposits, might beg to differ.

Pensions.

Joe Hockey sought to inspire some confidence on retirement incomes.

“I want to reassure all Australian workers that they can have confidence in their retirement plans under this government. There will be no new taxes on superannuation under this government, and their age pension will continue to increase twice a year this year and every year at the highest available index rate,” he said last night.

 “These measures are all intended to provide security and and certainty for older australians in the years ahead.”

The key ‘benefit’ to all pensioners is the dropping of plans to reduce the rate at which they were indexed. It never happened but generated plenty of fear and anger.

Despite fears of cuts to the Pensioner Concession Card, which delivers much-appreciated discounts on public transport, utilities, medicines and GPs, it has also been quarantined from changes.

So those who might lose access to the pension with the new assets test and still have the card will keep it.

But the real meat of the changes for older Australians involved tightening the pensions assets test, to keep the pension – more than 10% of government spending – sustainable and affordable.

The new thresholds to the pension-asset test and changes to the taper rate will see 50,000 more of us get the full pension. In addition, 122,000 part-pensioners will get another $30 a fortnight.

But the $44 billion annual bill for the Age Pension bill has been cut by $2.4 billion and there are some losers who, while they may be portrayed as relatively well-off, will have complaints.

By the government’s own figures they include 91,000 who will lose the pension altogether and 235,000 who will find their pension reduced.

The changes have been largely greeted by seniors’ group but analysts have pointed out it brings uncertainty into the incentives to save for your retirement. Under the changes some people who’ve saved more will end up worse off than those who’ve saved less.

In simple terms, as outlined by Andrew Main in Tuesday’s The Australian a home-owning couple, with assets outside the house worth less than $600,000, get a higher income than an otherwise similar couple with assets worth between $650,000- $1.1million.

He says the changes to the taper rate would leave a couple with $800,000 of assets about $12,000 a year worse off.

The argument around who gets what in the pension will continue, and that means over-50s will continue to feel insecure.

Work

The incentives for employers to engage older workers are to be overhauled with faster access to a $10,000 subsidy for hiring new workers aged over 50.

The program called Restart is meant to make it easier for older workers to get jobs. The Treasurer said the changes were designed to make the subsidies more available when and where they were needed.

You have to wonder whether the scheme is not working, given it’s only a year old.

There will also be a scheme to offer better training for older workers to find work instead of relying on benefits, which the FiftyUp Club has been calling for over a year. Read more about Seniors concerned about job competition here

HAVE YOUR SAY: 

Was the Budget fair on FiftyUps? How will it affect you? Is it the right Budget for Australia in 2015?

Take our 2-minute Post-Budget Snap Poll and rate the Government's fiscal efforts HERE

Originally posted on .

Join the conversation

FiftyUp Club
What the Budget means for FiftyUps

Share your views with other members. 

Want to leave a comment? or .
Read our moderation policy here.
Alain
Alain from NSW commented:

You cannot live in a country where being young, being a student, being unemployed, being a middle class person, being a stay at home mother, being a 'poor' self funded pensioner, YOU will be HIT HARD by your government, do you? As a friend told me: " they wanted to pay rich women to have babies now they are taking money off poorer people who have babies!" adding: " FTB B cut off at 6 years old. You have no idea how that is going to affect Single parent families. Low income folk get nothing but more hits again, THEIR taxes are used to fund all the promises to families, businesses and companies! Tony Abbott is a lowlife he's attacked students, health care system and pensioners, who ever voted these d*** h**** in now should be ashamed of themselves " 

Alain
Alain from NSW commented:

After a good read of Budget "Take 2", it can be resumed to the following: ) A cut paid parental leave for 80,000 mothers. 2) People under 25 will still have to wait for 4 weeks to get benefits if they are unemployed. 3) $80 billion in cuts to schools and hospitals. 4) Cuts to family payments hurting families across Australia. 5) $100,000 degrees are still on the agenda. 6) Stay at home parents will lose access to childcare rebates. As unfair a Budget as last year's outrageous one & like last year's Budget, just good for THE BIN ! 

Alain
Alain from NSW commented:

As Peter Martin in The SMH reminds us: Fifty-five of Australia's highest earners paid no income tax at all during 2012-13, not even the Medicare levy. All earned at least $1 million and managed to write their taxable incomes down to below the $18,200 tax-free threshold, although for most the exercise was expensive. Tax statistics released Wednesday reveal that 40 of them claimed an extraordinary $42.5 million for the "cost of managing tax affairs" meaning they each paid an average of $1 million to an adviser prepared to help to bring down their taxable income, which is itself a tax deduction. Who is in charge of Australia? No, seriously! One can wonder... 

Alain
Alain from NSW replied to Alain:

Fifty five LNP's voters for you... 

Peter
Peter from QLD commented:

Hockey's claim that power is cheap is a blatant lie. It IS CHEAPER because of the carbon tax being abolished, but power companies have been ripping us off (with government blessing) for some time now. They were also very reluctant to reduce their prices when the tax went. In my case, Ergon Energy are fleecing us with ever increasing fees such as the so-called "service fee". This impacts heavily on people such as pensioners who have cut their power consumption to the bone, yet are still slugged unfairly. It's a form of minimum charge that is both unfair & unjustified. 

Carol
Carol from NSW commented:

Me thinks Allain is a member of the Labor party - 

Alain
Alain from NSW replied to Carol:

What do you think, Carol of the ultimate reason the fat cats of Libs have put this budget together, here it is (and THAT IS EXACTLY what will happen with this Budget) and are we Aussies, going to let a single mother that struggles to look after her two kids and try to study and do part time work (when there is not a lot of work around the place) be put, her and her kids out on the street with this new budget? THIS IS WHAT THIS BUDGET IS ABOUT 

Alain
Alain from NSW replied to Carol:

No, Carol, I am not, you just need to be a fairdinkum Aussie with a bit of empathy to write what I write. 

Sharyn
Sharyn from VIC commented:

I agree with you Alain from NSW. Compulsory Super was bought in in maybe the late "80's (I'm sure someone will know the correct date), we haven't had a chance to save through this avenue throughout our whole working lives which means most of us will either receive a full or part pension when and if we ever retire! I think it is time that the wealthy stop receiving tax breaks for their super contributions and start paying more tax, they don't need it and it would pour billions into the budget and the same with Investment properties, if someone can afford to purchase an investment property well in my books they don't need any tax breaks. This and any Gov't. needs to change the ways they give to the rich and take from the poor and take a leaf from Robin Hood and take from the rich to provide for the poor. I agree with you to Bryan from Vic, it is absolutely outrageous that pollies receive lucrative super and other perks for the rest of their lives, this indeed needs a revolution (these days it can be by written word alone), why should they have it so easy when the majority of us will struggle to make ends meet on the pension when most people I know are just as committed to our Country as the pollies say they are, so what's the difference? 

Bryan
Bryan from VIC commented:

Not a word about our fat cat cigar chomping pollies and their ridiculous pensions and other perks living of the taxpayer even after they have been kicked out of office.wheres the cuts to their pensions and super ?we need a revolution to rid this country. Of these blood suckers! 

Alain
Alain from NSW commented:

What is a serious worry (as previously mentioned), the most urgent is totally eluded by the Libs in their Budget: CLIMATE CHANGE which should be the priority, the costs are going to be massive, to give you an idea, the destruction of the cyclone category 2 we experienced on the NSW Central Coast will guarantee that Insurance Premiums are going to increase, and soon, with more similar events, there won't be anyone who will be able to afford insurance policies (and no more insurance companies...) so it is just an exemple with other events like the drought for some farmers, etc... We are 'sh***ing in our nest and we must rmedy the causes of climate change, nobody else will do it at our place and the fact that this serious issue is totally ignored by the obnoxious Libs (in denial, which makes them a dangerous lot for the rest of us...) in the 2015 Budget: WE MUST REMIND THEM OF THEIR OBLIGATIONS , or LET'S GET RID OF THEM! 

Thelma
Thelma from NSW commented:

I read in the Sunday telegraph 3/5/15 that they will be spending $285 million on Australians learning more about WW1 - money should be spent on Australia's future not the dim past - 

John
John from NSW commented:

This govornment appear to tinker around the edges of everything. They have few if any big plans to produce real full time jobs . Manufacturing is a large employer and the industries that feed into them . Still the focus seems to be on mining and primary industry while other developed countries have realised the value of such industries. They produce jobs and especially for more mature citizens. We need real plans and not tinkering to get older Australians in work or keep them in work for longer. 

Alain
Alain from NSW replied to John:

Brilliant, John!!! 

Comment Guidelines