News

News Power Cuts or Power Bill Cuts – Does it really come down to a choice?
 Power Cuts or Power Bill Cuts – Does it really come down to a choice?

Power Cuts or Power Bill Cuts – Does it really come down to a choice?

Who do you believe – the energy regulator charged with putting the long-term interests of consumers first? Or the NSW ‘poles and wires’ companies which actually deliver the stuff? 

That’s essentially the argument behind a high stakes legal stoush which will determine the size of planned 5-12% reductions to your next electricity bills.

And it’s especially important for older Australians who generally face higher bills. They are at home more, spend a higher proportion of their income on electricity; and are hit harder by climbing supply charges.

But those big savings promised to consumers are now under threat as the poles and wires companies and the NSW state government which owns them launch legal appeals against planned price cuts due on July 1.

So the FiftyUp Club is going to launch an appeal of its own: from today we’re asking you, the members, to send us your views on the legal battle, and tell us how higher electricity costs have impacted on your wallet and way of life.

Click Here to have your say by answering a few questions and commenting in our FiftyUp Forum

Read on to see what’s at stake, send in your comments and ideas and we’ll package them up for the tribunal hearing the case to ensure your voice is heard.

THE FULL STORY

The Australian Energy Regulator (AER) has fixed a five-year pricing determination which cut the amounts the NSW state-owned poles and wires businesses could charge us by some $6 billion to 2019.

It adds up to big savings for the consumer of between $100 and $300 a year depending where you live. It is aimed to bring the costs of delivery to NSW households in line with those levied by the privately-owned networks in SA and Victoria. Presently they can be twice as much.

We’re told those networks are more efficient and employ less workers, delivering lower costs to consumers. Falling demand for electricity means there’s also less need to build expensive ‘gold plated’ networks.

It was the massive investment and poorly controlled spending in the high-tech and high-cost ‘poles and wires’, including pylons and transformers, which saw many bills blow out by more than 70% in the past five years.

Network costs can add up to almost 60% of some people’s energy bills especially if they live in the higher cost of service rural areas.

But the NSW government and their poles and wires companies have lodged appeals to the Australian Competition Tribunal, claiming the cuts to their revenue mean they can’t operate safely or reliably.

They are backed by the trade unions as 2,200 jobs are at stake. The network companies say they have already shaved more than $3 billion and 3000 jobs from their capital and operating programs.

They also claim the cuts mean they can’t manage vegetation growth in rural areas, which, as the 2009 Victorian bushfires demonstrated, can carry serious risks.

Their arguments may sound convincing but have drawn fire from numerous quarters.

The ALP says the AER’s decision is fair and the NSW Government only wants to increase the waning value of the networks – a large part of which are up for a $13 billion long-term lease.

Groups representing consumers, welfare and business have also attacked the appeal and the Public Interest Advocacy Centre has brought its own legal challenge arguing for even bigger spending cuts on the networks.

To have your say, help us put together a submission to the Competition Tribunal.  Spend a few minutes answering the snap poll above on how power prices have affected your life, and leave a comment in our forum below.

We will report back soon on the next steps and make sure the voice of FiftyUps is heard.

From Christopher Zinn & The FiftyUp Club Team

Useful Links:

Daily Telegraph, 21 May, 2105, "Networks NSW will appeal energy regulators decision to cut the price of power bills for consumers": www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/networks-nsw-will-appeal-energy-regulators-decision-to-cut-the-price-of-power-bills-for-consumers/story-fni0cx12-1227363388780

Sydney Morning Herald, 21 May 2015, "Electricity price cuts, privatisation plans under threat as power networks set up fight with regulator": www.smh.com.au/business/electricity-price-cuts-privatisation-plans-under-threat-as-power-networks-set-up-fight-with-regulator-20150521-gh6meh.html

The Australian, 21 May, 2015, "NSW power networks to fight cuts in court": http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/nsw-power-networks-to-fight-cuts-in-court/story-e6frg8zx-1227364313737

 

 

 

Originally posted on .

Join the conversation

FiftyUp Club
Power Cuts or Power Bill Cuts – Does it really come down to a choice?

Share your views with other members. 

Want to leave a comment? or .
Read our moderation policy here.
Gordon
Gordon from QLD commented:

Energy companies have been gold plating the wires & poles budget for years, so we pay extra. This is fraud & should be prosecuted as such. Maintenance budgets should be run stringently not excessively. Govt bodies do not have the guts to take on these Energy fraudsters. ASIC & ATO & regulators need to crack down hard on CEOs as example to bring recalcitrants into line. Audit them regularly to get compliance, As ATO does with small businesses. 

Ronald
Ronald from NSW commented:

Yes it does, I recently had a phone call from energy australia wanting to give me a 15% discount on my electricity bill so i went to my supplier and they have given me a higher discount for me saving me about $150 a year as long as i pay on time .R Behrmann...Sydney 

Someone
Someone from NSW commented:

Spain, Germany , France, etc... Why not Australia with reliable renewable energy sources FREE from the sun, the wind, the oceans currents, geothermic , etc... Is it 'cause "some" finance "some" political parties in Australia and are "untouchable"? Why are our deserts NOT covered with solar panels? With something like this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PS20_solar_power_plant 

carol
carol from NSW commented:

i cant see how the nsw gov will save all that money if they can why do we have to sell? if we cut back the employees working after hours when it could be done in ordinary time this is where the costs escalate.i dont believe we can trust any of them.we put solar panels on 5 yrs ago because the media said we wouldnt be able to pay.now we have 2gb telling us we are ripping off the state. why not encourage every one to put them on and save a power station.also the $90 a quarter on our bill for access is a real rip off carol fitzgerald nsw 

dale
dale from QLD commented:

they charge me more ,but goin by the graph on the power bill idont use any more than i did last year, 

Glenys
Glenys from QLD commented:

Unfortunately I live in regional Queensland and only have one power provider available which makes it very difficult to do any bargaining. It's a case of having to grin and bear it even though I'm not happy with the pricing. 

Wayne
Wayne from VIC commented:

An easy way to deliver significant savings without even looking at seeking to address real and long overdue changes within the industry structures including resource levels and determination of both OPEX and CAPEX spending on networks Simply remove the unjustifiable daily service changes that would deliver around $400 pa savings to everyone immediately May be worth a thought for the decision makers 

Someone
Someone from NSW replied to Wayne:

Good one, Wayne! 

Phillip
Phillip from VIC commented:

Sorry about my spelling - I got excited and my dementia kicked in - I am an oldie, you know! Here is my message, corrected: I am totally with Barbara from QLD. Simply, I am not going to pay $1183 per quarter! We have 18 solar panels and I get $45 off my bill, but the price goes up and they tell me are 'spikes' in usage! It is time we organised a 'no power' day. Could we do it? A day when we turned everything off and relied on batteries? Or stayed in bed? Would 50,000 'no consumers' make a difference they would notice? 

Ann
Ann from QLD commented:

I have charges of $86.00 added on to my bill every quarter, with a description of "service charges". I have been given a vague response by Click energy call operators, that it probably is a charge by Energex for meter reading. "WTF" if this is correct, Energex must be making a motza from every energy user in Australia, or is it just Queensland ????? I am wondering if anyone else queries this. 

Ronald
Ronald from NSW replied to Ann:

Hi Anne this is correct i get an $78 charge on my bill to and was told by my supplier it was a meter reading extra payment. It only takes the chap 5 seconds to do the meter reading and i get charged $78 there are about 30 houses in my street so that works out to be $2350 in one street alone these companies are raking in billions of dollars a year just for a 5 second meter reading something should be done about it ..Ronald 

Phillip
Phillip from VIC commented:

I am totally with Barbara from QLD. Simply, I am not going to pay $1183 per quarter! We have 18 solar panels and I get $45 buck off, but the price goes up with that they tell me are 'spikes' in usage! It is time we organised a 'no power' day. Could we do it? A day when we turned everything off and relied on batteries? Or stayed in bed? Would 50,000 'no consumers' make a difference they would notice? 

Jann
Jann from NSW replied to Phillip:

Philip, 3/6/2015 Am aghast at what your say you pay/q. I took up solar early in June 2010, started with 12 panels and 2 years ago added an extra 6 and haven't paid a bill plus banked $4500+ to date. Maybe you can change providers?? or have your appliances checked for usage. Something is certainly not right. mitch37 

Comment Guidelines